GS1729 Myanmar Stoves Campaign - Soneva in Myanmar - VPA No. 016
GS-2022 ↗ · current registry ID: GS7539
#1112of 1329 in Industrial#25of 25 in Myanmar#1563of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)
Audit Analysis
A Gold Standard cookstove efficiency project in Myanmar with VVB-confirmed additionality but significant documentation quality issues, including 27 material findings and 27 corrective actions. The project delivered roughly 46% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the monitoring period, reflecting conservative actual performance against optimistic initial assumptions (100% usage rate vs. 83.6% verified). Multiple contradictions across documents and the absence of a buffer pool or stated permanence mechanism limit confidence in long-term integrity.
Red Flags
- 27 material findings and 27 corrective actions identified by the VVB, including calculation errors in baseline and project emissions, discount factor inconsistencies, and stove count discrepancies (1,410 vs 1,499)
- Usage rate assumed at 100% in the ex-ante estimate but verified at only 83.6%, a 16.4% gap that inflates the initial credit estimate
- Discrepancy between the PoA total of 30,000 stoves and the VPA figure of 1,610 stoves, raising questions about project scope clarity
- Leakage deduction reduced from 5% (2022 verification) to 0% (2023 verification) with only a 'quantified' justification, without clear explanation of the change
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 4,933 | 4,933 | 0 | |
| 2020 | 7,723 | 6,627 | 1,096 | |
| 2021 | 6,431 | 2,819 | 3,612 | |
| 2022 | 4,599 | 0 | 4,599 | |
| 2023 | 625 | 0 | 625 | |
| Total | 24,311 | 14,379 | 9,932 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
0% deduction, justification thin, was 5% previously
Project-specific, no reassessment date stated
Grievance mechanism present, FPIC not conducted
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →