Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticRwandaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

GS5047 VPA49 African Improved Cookstoves and Clean Water Programme: Gishwati – Mukura Forest Conservation Project III

GS-2731 ↗ · current registry ID: GS10742

#1152of 1329 in Industrial#114of 139 in Rwanda#1606of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

4.0/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
3.5
Claim Safety
3.5
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

This Gold Standard cookstove project in Rwanda has a combined additionality test and a locally measured fNRB, but is undermined by eight inter-document contradictions, over 30 corrective actions required by the VVB, and critical gaps in permanence, verified emissions, and safeguards documentation. The 16-fold discrepancy in claimed ERR figures between documents is a serious reliability concern that cannot be resolved from the available record.

Red Flags

  • Claimed ERR of 92,558 in the monitoring report contradicts a figure of 5,850 from an unidentified source — a 16-fold discrepancy with no ex-ante lifetime figure available to adjudicate
  • Over 30 corrective actions were required by SustainCERT before verification could be completed, including errors in fNRB values, usage rate calculations, sampling design, and vintage break calculations
  • No buffer pool percentage, no reversal event data, and no permanence claim period are stated in any available document, leaving permanence risk entirely unaddressed
  • Leakage treatment is contradictory: the verification report states it was 'quantified' while the monitoring report describes it as 'deemed negligible', with a 0% deduction in both cases
  • FPIC status is not confirmed in any document, and the grievance mechanism is affirmed in the verification report but absent from the PDD

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2021
6516510
2022
9,7719,657114
2023
9,8911,3488,543
2024
10,000010,000
Total30,31311,65618,657

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test applied but VVB confirmation not explicitly stated

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deduction with contradictory justifications across documents

Baseline

Project-specific baseline, no reassessment date recorded

Safeguards

Mentioned in VR but contradicted by MR; FPIC unconfirmed

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both unstated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-04General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents