Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticRwandaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

GS5047 VPA80 African Improved Cookstoves and Clean Water Programme: Gishwati – Mukura Forest Conservation Project VIII

GS-2975 ↗ · current registry ID: GS11016

#626of 1329 in Industrial#44of 139 in Rwanda#953of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

4.9/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
4.0

Audit Analysis

A Gold Standard improved-cookstove distribution project in Rwanda with VVB-confirmed additionality and no reversal events, but undermined by 37 outstanding corrective actions, nine cross-document contradictions (including conflicting leakage justifications and fNRB values), and a project-specific baseline with no stated reassessment date. The data-quality issues and contradictory records significantly erode confidence in the verified emission reductions.

Red Flags

  • 37 corrective actions remain open in the 2026 verification report, spanning data inconsistencies, missing carbon waiver forms, sampling confidence gaps, and unaddressed stove-crack repairs — indicating systemic monitoring-report quality problems
  • Leakage justification is contradictory: the 2026 verification report states 'quantified' while the 2026 monitoring report states 'deemed negligible', yet the deduction is 0% in both cases
  • fNRB value has shifted across documents (0.77 in the 2020 PDD, 0.98→0.89 correction noted in material findings, 0.89 in the 2026 VR), and the method changed from 'national default' (2023 VR) to 'local field' (2026 VR), raising questions about baseline robustness
  • Safeguards are confirmed in the 2026 verification report but explicitly absent in the 2026 monitoring report for the same period, creating a direct contradiction on a core Gold Standard requirement

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2022
3,8503,8500
2023
9,9139,715198
2024
10,000010,000
Total23,76313,56510,198

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

stove crack reported

Leakage

0% deduction with contradictory justifications across documents

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; reassessment date not stated; fNRB revised multiple times

Safeguards

Confirmed in VR but contradicted by MR for same period

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-04General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents