GS5658 VPA 36: “Access to energy for local development and resilience building in Uganda”
GS-3031 ↗ · current registry ID: GS11043
#548of 1329 in Industrial#66of 163 in Uganda#846of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)
Audit Analysis
This Gold Standard domestic energy-efficiency project in Uganda has VVB-confirmed additionality and documented safeguards, but is undermined by a project-specific baseline, a 0% leakage deduction, and a verification report containing 15 material findings including three corrective-action requests for calculation errors and a crediting-period mismatch. The project delivered roughly 124% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the most recent monitoring period, suggesting the baseline estimate was slightly conservative. Overall, the project is functional but carries moderate data-reliability and baseline-robustness risks.
Red Flags
- Three Corrective Action Requests (CARs) in the verification report flag calculation errors in MR Table 2, crediting-period mismatch between the MR and the VPA-DD/SC application, and calculation errors for NPy and Project Estimate in MR Section E2 — indicating material MRV weaknesses.
- Leakage deduction is 0% despite the project type (domestic stove distribution) where displaced fuel use outside the project boundary is plausible; the PDD characterises leakage as 'deemed negligible' while the 2023 monitoring report calls it 'quantified', creating an unresolved inconsistency.
- No buffer-pool percentage or permanence mechanism is stated in any available document, leaving reversal risk for the 5-year crediting period unaddressed in the extracted record.
- The additionality test type is not identified in the extracted record, so the specific basis (investment, regulatory, or barrier test) cannot be independently assessed.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6,887 | 6,887 | 0 | |
| 2023 | 9,585 | 7,785 | 1,800 | |
| 2024 | 1,448 | 0 | 1,448 | |
| Total | 17,920 | 14,672 | 3,248 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed but test type not stated
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
0% deduction, inconsistent justification across docs
Project-specific, no reassessment date stated
Grievance & benefit-sharing present, FPIC not stated
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →