Guodian Jingbian Jishanliang Phase II 49.5MW Wind Farm Project
#615of 1935 in Renewable energy#292of 1084 in China#420of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#471of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
A 49.5 MW onshore wind project in China registered under CDM with a well-established methodology (ACM0002) and VVB-confirmed additionality. However, the validation report carried over 20 conditions and 3 corrective actions, and several key fields (verified ERR, FPIC, grievance mechanism, buffer pool) are absent from the extracted record. Multiple contradictions between the 2012 validation report and the 2021 monitoring report—particularly on baseline method and leakage justification—reduce confidence in data consistency.
Red Flags
- 20+ conditions (CLs) and 3 corrective actions (CARs) were raised during validation, indicating significant documentation and evidentiary gaps at the time of registration
- Baseline method is reported as 'project' in the 2021 monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the 2012 validation report—an unresolved contradiction that affects baseline validity
- Verified ERR (total_err_verified) is not found in any available document, preventing independent confirmation of actual emissions reductions
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 295,368 | 0 | 295,368 | |
| 2021 | 291,920 | 0 | 291,920 | |
| Total | 587,288 | 0 | 587,288 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
Avoidance project, no reversal risk
0% deduction, contradictory justification
Method contradiction across documents
Mentioned but FPIC/grievance not documented
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →Share this rating
