Skip to main content
CDMWindChinaACM0002

Guodian Ningxia Qingtongxia Niushoushan Phase I 49.5MW Wind-farm project

CDM-5315 ↗

#993of 1084 in China#1337of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#1178of 1287 in ACM0002

4.1/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
3.0
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
3.0

Audit Analysis

A 49.5 MW onshore wind project in Ningxia, China, validated by Bureau Veritas under CDM methodology ACM0002. Additionality was confirmed via a combined test and the jurisdictional grid-emission-factor baseline is appropriate for wind, but nine material findings were raised during validation and a severe seven-fold discrepancy in claimed emission reductions between the PDD and the validation report undermines confidence in the project's quantified output. No monitoring reports or post-validation data were available for review.

Red Flags

  • Claimed emission reductions differ by a factor of ~7 between the PDD (639,338 tCO₂e) and the validation report (91,334 tCO₂e), a discrepancy that is not explained in the available documents
  • Nine material findings and corrective actions were raised during validation, including incorrect IRR tax calculation, inconsistent dates in the EIA and purchase agreement, and a monitoring plan that omitted spare-wire electricity import
  • No monitoring reports, verified emission reductions, or post-validation data were found in the extracted record, leaving the project's actual performance entirely unassessed
  • Baseline method is stated as 'jurisdictional' in the validation report but 'project' in the PDD, creating ambiguity about which baseline was actually applied

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

Avoidance project

Leakage

0% deemed negligible (appropriate for wind)

Baseline

Jurisdictional grid EF; PDD contradiction

Safeguards

Mentioned; no FPIC or grievance detail

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-30ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents