Skip to main content
CDMWindChinaACM0002

Guohua Shenmu Dunliang Wind Farm Project

CDM-8349 ↗

#1374of 1935 in Renewable energy#835of 1084 in China#1109of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#1061of 1287 in ACM0002

4.6/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
4.0

Audit Analysis

A 49.5 MW onshore wind farm in China validated under CDM methodology ACM0002 with a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test and a jurisdictional grid-emission-factor baseline. The project is inherently low-risk (avoidance-type, no reversal exposure), but the validation report carries 14 material findings and three cross-document contradictions—including a seven-fold discrepancy in the claimed emission reduction—significantly undermining confidence in the data. No monitoring or verification reports are available, leaving the project's actual performance unverified.

Red Flags

  • Seven-fold discrepancy in total claimed emissions reductions: the PDD states 590,478 tCO₂ while the validation report states 84,354 tCO₂ for the same 7-year crediting period (2013–2019); the VVB figure is privileged but the gap is unexplained
  • 14 material findings and corrective actions in the validation report, including incomplete demonstration that static investment would not decrease (CAR7) and a common-practice analysis not fully aligned with the CDM additionality tool (CAR8)
  • No monitoring or verification reports are present in the extracted record; total verified emissions reductions are not stated, so actual delivery cannot be assessed
  • Additionality test type is inconsistent between documents: the PDD describes a 'combined' test while the validation report records an 'investment' test

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed but with material findings on investment test

Permanence

Avoidance project – no reversal risk

Leakage

0% deduction, justified as negligible for wind

Baseline

Jurisdictional grid EF (0.8964, 2011)

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism not detai

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-30ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents