Guohua Zhucheng Wind Farm Project (Phase I)

Audit Analysis

A CDM wind project in China with VVB-confirmed additionality and a standard grid-emission-factor baseline, but undermined by a 55% discrepancy in claimed emissions reductions between the validation and monitoring reports, conflicting leakage justifications, and a baseline-method contradiction. The project is an avoidance-type wind installation with inherently low reversal risk, yet the absence of verified ERR figures and multiple null fields limit confidence in the actual credit volume.

Project Description

Red Flags

• ⚠Claimed ERR of 132,450 tCO2e in the monitoring report (2014) is 55% higher than the 85,567 tCO2e in the validation report (2012); without a verified ERR figure the true delivery cannot be confirmed
• ⚠Baseline method is stated as 'project-specific' in the monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the validation report — an unresolved contradiction that affects the credibility of the baseline
• ⚠Leakage justification is 'quantified' in the monitoring report but 'deemed negligible' in the validation report, while the deduction is 0% in both — the basis for the zero deduction is inconsistent
• ⚠Five corrective actions were required at validation (DNA approval letter, title consistency, timeline, baseline EF calculation, IRR sheet), indicating the PDD had material errors before registration

Credit Vintages