Skip to main content
CFCUrban Forest CarbonUnited StatesGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Hambden Hills

CFC-hambden-hills ↗

#78of 345 in United States#38of 59 in City Forest Credits (CFC)

5.9/ 10
Integrity
6.2
Transparency
5.2
Claim Safety
5.8
Documentation
6.8

Audit Analysis

Hambden Hills is a 40-year urban tree preservation project under the City Forest Credits standard with VVB-confirmed additionality and a 10% buffer pool, but it relies on a project-specific baseline, lacks a quantified leakage deduction in the available record, and shows a minor discrepancy between the PDD and validation ERR figures. The project is structurally sound for a CFC tree-preservation credit but sits in a less transparent registry with several monitoring and safeguards details not stated in the extracted documents.

Red Flags

  • PDD (2025-09-10) lists 6,599 total ERR while the validation report (2026-01-30) and verification report both state 5,939 — a ~9% downward revision that is not explicitly explained in the available documents.
  • The verification report (2026-01-28) marks reversal events as 'not addressed' while the validation report (2026-01-30) states 'none reported'; the 10% buffer pool exists but the verification report does not confirm its adequacy or the status of the 660 credits already contributed to the Reversal Pool.
  • Leakage is described as 'quantified' in the justification field, yet no specific deduction percentage appears in any extracted document, leaving the actual magnitude of the leakage adjustment unverifiable.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2026
5,36205,362
Total5,36205,362

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test confirmed by VVB

Permanence

reversal status contradictory

Leakage

Labelled quantified but no pct stated

Baseline

Project-specific; reassessment date not stated

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned; FPIC and grievance not stated

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents