Haouma Wind Farm Project, developed by NAREVA HOLDING
#1031of 1935 in Renewable energy#7of 12 in Morocco#767of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#812of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
The Haouma Wind Farm is a CDM wind project with VVB-confirmed additionality, but the record is marred by five inter-document contradictions, eight material findings, and ten corrective actions that indicate the PDD required substantial revision before approval. The absence of a verified ERR figure, a 0% leakage deduction with inconsistent justification, and a project-specific baseline (contradicting the validation report's jurisdictional framing) limit confidence in the credit's robustness. The project's inherent low-risk profile as a wind displacement activity partially offsets these documentation and methodological concerns.
Red Flags
- Five contradictions between the validation report (2011) and monitoring report/PDD (2018) on leakage justification, additionality test type, baseline method, ERR figures, and crediting period dates
- Eight material findings and ten corrective actions in the validation report, including errors in the emission factor calculation spreadsheet and an additionality demonstration that initially did not follow the required tool steps
- No verified ERR figure found in any available document; the monitoring report's 178,357 tCO₂e figure is unconfirmed against the PDD's 941,472 tCO₂e lifetime claim
- Leakage deduction of 0% with contradictory justification: the monitoring report states leakage was 'not addressed' while the validation report states it was 'deemed negligible'
- Grid emission factor of 0.7005 tCO₂/MWh is from 2008, and no updated or reassessed baseline value is found in the extracted record
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 178,357 | 0 | 178,357 | |
| Total | 178,357 | 0 | 178,357 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed but initially non-compliant with tool steps
Wind displacement – no inherent reversal risk
0% deduction with contradictory justification across documen
Project-specific vs jurisdictional contradiction; grid EF fr
Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; no FPIC or grievan
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →