CDMWindChinaACM0002

Heilongjiang Xingkaihu Fengmishan Wind Farm Project

CDM-5917 ↗

#1498of 1935 in Renewable energy#940of 1084 in China#1256of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#1144of 1287 in ACM0002

4.3/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
3.5

Scored2026-08-31medium confidence

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Audit Analysis

A CDM wind energy project in China with a jurisdictional baseline and a 7-year crediting period, validated by CCSC. The project carries a material finding regarding an inconsistency in the build margin emission factor calculation method, and several key data points (additionality test type, monitoring period, FNRB) are absent from the extracted record. Low extraction confidence and the absence of a monitoring report limit the depth of assessment.

Red Flags

  • Material finding (CAR 1): build margin emission factor calculation method was inconsistent with Tool version 7.0, requiring corrective action — this directly affects baseline accuracy and the magnitude of claimed credits
  • Additionality test type and VVB confirmation of additionality are not stated in the extracted record, leaving the additionality basis unverified in available documentation
  • Minimum extraction confidence is rated low, and one of the four source documents is of unknown type, reducing reliability of the evidence base

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2017
381,7500381,750
2022
368,6770368,677
Total750,4270750,427

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Test type not stated in record; VVB validated but basis unco

Permanence

Wind project — no biogenic reversal risk

Leakage

0% deduction, deemed negligible — consistent with wind

Baseline

Jurisdictional baseline, but build margin EF calculation fla

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-31ACM0002
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents →