Skip to main content
CFCUrban Forest CarbonUnited StatesGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Hennepin Forest Carbon Offsets

CFC-hennepin-forest-carbon-offsets ↗

#34of 345 in United States#17of 59 in City Forest Credits (CFC)

6.3/ 10
Integrity
6.8
Transparency
5.8
Claim Safety
6.2
Documentation
6.2

Audit Analysis

The Hennepin County urban tree planting project presents a well-structured additionality case with a VVB-verified combined test and a jurisdictional baseline, supported by a 26-year legal permanence obligation and no reported reversals. However, the absence of a quantified leakage deduction, the use of an individual rather than an institutional VVB, and a crediting-period discrepancy between the validation and verification reports introduce moderate uncertainty. The project delivered roughly 88–106% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the first monitoring period, indicating reasonable claim calibration.

Red Flags

  • Leakage deduction is not quantified and no justification is provided in any available document, despite the project type (urban tree planting) where displacement of existing canopy or alternative land use could theoretically occur.
  • The crediting period start date differs between the validation report (2022-11-03) and the verification report (2020-05-04), creating ambiguity about the true project start and the length of the crediting window.
  • The VVB is an individual (Matthew Lee) rather than an accredited verification body, which raises questions about institutional independence and capacity for a 26-year crediting period.

Credit Vintages Exhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2023
2042040
Total2042040

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-verified combined test

Permanence

26-yr legal obligation, no reversals

Leakage

Not quantified, no justification

Baseline

Jurisdictional baseline

Safeguards

Mentioned but FPIC/grievance not stated

Double-claim

CORSIA/CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents