Heqing Solar Cooker Project II
#19of 150 in Cookstoves#155of 1084 in China#251of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#4of 115 in AMS-I.C
Audit Analysis
The Heqing Solar Cooker Project II is a CDM avoidance project with a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test and a reputable verification body (TÜV Rheinland Japan Ltd.), but it is undermined by a project-specific baseline, a 0% leakage deduction with contradictory justifications across documents, and an unresolved internal inconsistency in the claimed ERR figures within the same monitoring report. The absence of a verified ERR figure and a confirmed usage rate limits confidence in the actual credit volume.
Red Flags
- Internal contradiction in the 2018 monitoring report: total ERR claimed appears as both 102,557 and 154,035 tCO₂e within the same document, a ~50% discrepancy that cannot be resolved from available records
- Leakage justification is inconsistent: the 2011 validation report states leakage was 'deemed negligible' while the 2018 monitoring report describes it as 'quantified,' yet the deduction remains 0% in both cases
- Verified ERR figure is not stated in any available document, preventing independent confirmation of actual reductions against the claimed total
- Usage rate is assumed at 129.3 (units not specified) but no verified usage rate is reported in the monitoring record
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 143,956 | 0 | 143,956 | |
| 2014 | 150,705 | 0 | 150,705 | |
| 2015 | 205,270 | 0 | 205,270 | |
| 2016 | 63,580 | 0 | 63,580 | |
| 2017 | 153,545 | 0 | 153,545 | |
| Total | 717,056 | 0 | 717,056 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
0% deduction with contradictory justification across documen
Project-specific baseline, no reassessment recorded
Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →