Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticSouth AfricaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Highveld Air Quality - Highveld Central Project

GS-5 ↗ · current registry ID: GS1006

#977of 1329 in Industrial#35of 59 in South Africa#1404of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

4.4/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
3.0

Audit Analysis

The Highveld Central project is a domestic coal-fire energy-efficiency initiative with VVB-confirmed additionality, but it is undermined by an extraordinary volume of material findings (over 30), more than 20 corrective actions, multiple cross-document contradictions, and a very low survey response rate (7.57%) that weakens confidence in the verified emissions reductions. The project delivered only about 40% of the pro-rata expectation for the monitoring period, which is protective against over-crediting but raises questions about the robustness of the underlying data.

Red Flags

  • Over 30 material findings and 20+ corrective actions in the 2018 verification report, including surveys conducted after the monitoring period end date, missing documents, and ER spreadsheet formula-linking failures
  • Survey response rate of only 7.57% for coal-consumption questions, casting serious doubt on the representativeness of the monitoring data
  • Contradictory leakage justifications across monitoring reports: 'quantified' (2018) versus 'deemed negligible' (2016), with a 0% deduction in both cases
  • Crediting period end date is missing in the 2018 verification report while the 2018 monitoring report states 2022-04-30, creating uncertainty about the project's temporal scope
  • Additionality was recorded as unverified in the 2015 verification report but confirmed in the 2018 report, indicating a prior compliance gap

Credit Vintages Exhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2012
1,2481,2480
2013
3,7233,7230
2014
3,8433,8430
2015
3,3733,3730
2016
2,8082,8080
2017
1,2561,2560
2018
1141140
Total16,36516,3650

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test (2018)

Permanence

Avoidance-type design

Leakage

0% deduction; contradictory justification across reports

Baseline

Project-specific; no reassessment date found

Safeguards

Grievance mechanism and benefit sharing present; FPIC not stated; SD-indicator gaps

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-05General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents