Skip to main content
CCLand use (AFOLU)ColombiaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Jocū Bucūrō Apūrō

ECO-56 ↗

#3of 80 in ARR (afforestation)#16of 124 in Colombia#17of 99 in CerCarbono (CC)

5.7/ 10
Integrity
6.5
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

Jocū Bucūrō Apūrō is a Colombian REDD+ project with solid structural fundamentals—VVB-confirmed additionality, a jurisdictional baseline, a 9.5% buffer pool, and no reported reversals—but is undermined by a resolved geographic overlap with a neighbouring project, a 0% leakage deduction whose justification is internally inconsistent, and a first monitoring period that delivered only about 53–58% of the pro-rata ex-ante expectation. The large volume of corrective actions and low document-readability confidence further erode confidence in the project's data integrity.

Red Flags

  • Geographic overlap with the Dabucury REDD+ project (ID19) was identified post-certification; 10,003 and 95,292 credits were cancelled and the collective reserve replenished, indicating a boundary-definition failure at project design.
  • Leakage justification is internally contradictory within the same verification report: one section states leakage was 'deemed negligible' while another indicates it was 'not addressed', leaving the 0% deduction without a clear, consistent rationale.
  • The first monitoring period (2018–2021) verified only 115,461 tCO₂e against a pro-rata expectation of roughly 219,442 tCO₂e (≈53% delivery), a significant under-delivery that may signal over-optimistic ex-ante assumptions.
  • Low extraction confidence across the document set means at least one key document was poorly readable, limiting the reliability of the extracted data.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2018
1,29301,293
2019
1,16301,163
2020
1,97601,976
2021
1,94701,947
Total6,37906,379

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

9.5% buffer, no reversals

Leakage

0% deduction, inconsistent justification

Baseline

Jurisdictional baseline

Safeguards

FPIC + grievance mechanism

Double-claim

Overlap resolved; CORSIA/CCP unstated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents