Vai al contenuto principale
VCS Agriculture Forestry and Other Land Use Brazil Registry: Registered Documentazione completa General Methodology v2.0

Juruá REDD+ Project

VCS-3430 ↗

6.3 / 10
Integrity
7.2
Transparency
5.8
Claim Safety
5.9
Documentation
5.4

Score Breakdown

Integrity

verified Additionality was confirmed by the VVB using an investment test in the verification report.

missing Reversal events are marked as not addressed, and no reversal detail is available despite an 11% buffer pool.

Transparency

verified The verification report identifies Earthood Services Private Limited and covers the 2020-07-31 to 2022-07-30 monitoring period.

missing Total ERR claimed versus verified is not found in the extracted record, and usage monitoring details are not stated.

Claim Safety

verified Leakage is treated quantitatively, with a 10% deduction stated in the verification report.

missing CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are not stated, and the baseline is project-specific rather than a more conservative standardized baseline.

Documentation

verified The record includes a recent verification report dated 2025-08-04, with 10 documents used and no material findings or corrective actions required.

missing Extraction confidence is only medium, and the evidence-doc list is not identified beyond an unknown source reference.

Detailed Analysis

Integrity

The verification report confirms additionality through an investment test and says the VVB accepted the project, which supports the core integrity case. Leakage is handled with a 10% deduction, and the project also has an 11% buffer pool, but reversal treatment is not addressed in the extracted record and reversal detail is unavailable, which weakens permanence confidence.

Transparency

The monitoring period is clearly stated and the verification report is attributed to Earthood Services Private Limited, which helps traceability. Still, key public-accounting fields such as total ERR claimed versus verified and usage monitoring method are not found in the extracted record, so the MRV picture is incomplete.

Claim Safety

The project uses a project-specific baseline under VM0015, which is less conservative than a clearly standardized or jurisdictional baseline, but the quantified leakage deduction reduces over-crediting risk. CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are not stated, so the claim-safety assessment cannot benefit from a clear exclusion of dual-market claims.

Documentation

The documentation set appears moderately strong because the verification report is recent, the project has 10 documents used, and no material findings or corrective actions were reported. That said, extraction confidence is only medium and the evidence-doc list is not clearly identified, so some reliance on the record remains limited.

Overall

The project scores in the middle range because the strongest positives are VVB-confirmed additionality, quantified leakage treatment, and a clean verification outcome with no material findings. The main weaknesses are incomplete disclosure around reversals, missing ERR reconciliation fields, and unknown CORSIA/CCP status. There is one contradiction on leakage treatment: an earlier document reportedly said leakage was not addressed, while the later 2025-08-04 verification report supports a quantified leakage approach; I privileged the later verification report because it is more recent and more authoritative for the final verified status.

Audit Analysis

This is a reasonably well-documented REDD+ project with VVB-confirmed additionality, a quantified leakage deduction, and no material findings in the verification report. However, the project still has meaningful uncertainty around reversal treatment and some registry/claim fields are not stated in the extracted record, which limits confidence in the public-claim profile.

Project Description

Proponent: Multiple Proponents Protocol categories: Agriculture Forestry and Other Land Use Protocols: VM0015 Estimated annual GHG reductions: 13798 tCO2e Region: Latin America Registration date: 2025-08-04

Red Flags

  • Reversal risk is not clearly addressed in the extracted record, even though the project is a long-duration REDD+ activity.
  • The contradiction on leakage treatment suggests earlier documentation may have said leakage was not addressed, while the later verification report supports a quantified approach.

Credit Vintages

Nessuna emissione registrata sul registro.

Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio

  • Publish a clear reconciliation of claimed versus verified emission reductions, including the registry-level issuance and retirement trail.
  • Document reversal risk management in detail, including any monitoring, liability, and buffer allocation logic for the full crediting period.

Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

buffer pool present, reversal treatment unclear

Leakage

quantified 10% deduction

Baseline

project baseline, reassessment not stated

Safeguards

FPIC and grievance mechanism documented

Double-claim

CORSIA/CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis Provenance Scored 2026-04-19 General Methodology v2.0 Documentazione completa

Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?

Correzione metadati (gratuita)

Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.

Non modifica lo score.

[email protected]

Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti

Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.

Invia Documenti