Skip to main content
CFCUrban Forest CarbonUnited StatesGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Kendall County Forest Carbon Offsets

CFC-kendall-county-forest-carbon-o ↗

#129of 345 in United States#47of 59 in City Forest Credits (CFC)

5.4/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
6.0

Audit Analysis

The Fox River Bluffs Planting Project is a 40-acre urban tree-planting initiative under the City Forest Credits standard with VVB-confirmed additionality and a 5% reversal buffer pool. However, a contradiction between the verification report and the PDD on baseline method (jurisdictional vs. project-specific), combined with the absence of any leakage treatment or quantification, creates meaningful uncertainty around the robustness of the carbon claims. The project is small-scale and well-documented for its size, but several key MRV parameters remain unstated.

Red Flags

  • Baseline method contradiction: the 2021 verification report describes a jurisdictional baseline while the 2023 PDD describes a project-specific baseline; the more recent PDD value is privileged, weakening the baseline's robustness
  • No leakage deduction or justification is stated in any available document, despite tree-planting projects carrying inherent displacement and substitution risk
  • Reversal events are marked as 'not addressed' in the extracted record, even though the 5% Reversal Pool Account is described as a safeguard
  • CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are both unstated, leaving dual-channel risk unassessed

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2021
5060506
2024
2,02502,025
Total2,53102,531

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

No deduction or justification stated

Baseline

Contradiction: jurisdictional vs. project-specific

Safeguards

Mentioned but FPIC and grievance not documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both unstated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents