Skip to main content
CFCUrban Forest CarbonUnited StatesGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Kent Forest Carbon Offsets

CFC-kent-forest-carbon-offsets ↗

#111of 389 in United States#43of 59 in City Forest Credits (CFC)

5.7/ 10
Integrity
6.0
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

The Kent Forest Carbon Offsets project is a 2,449-tree urban preservation project in Ohio with VVB-confirmed additionality and a 10% reversal pool, but it carries notable gaps in safeguards documentation (no FPIC, no grievance mechanism), an unquantified leakage deduction, and a project-specific baseline. The apparent ERR discrepancy between documents is explained by the 10% reversal pool deduction (4,603 gross → 4,143 net), but the overall evidence base remains moderate.

Red Flags

  • Leakage justification is labelled 'quantified' in the verification report, yet no actual deduction percentage is stated in any available document, leaving the magnitude of the leakage treatment unknown.
  • No Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) process or grievance mechanism is documented, despite the project affecting a public university campus and surrounding community.
  • Two material findings were raised by the verifier (8 trees below the 5-inch minimum diameter threshold; Site 3 avoided-emissions recalculation using 30% rather than 20% impervious surface), indicating the initial project documentation contained calculation errors.
  • The verification report records reversal events as 'not addressed' while the validation report states 'none reported'; although the 10% reversal pool (460 credits) is described in the detail field, the inconsistent treatment across documents weakens confidence in permanence safeguards.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2023
4,14304,143
Total4,14304,143

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

10% pool present; field inconsistency across docs

Leakage

Labelled quantified but no % stated

Baseline

Project-specific; no reassessment date

Safeguards

Mentioned; no FPIC or grievance mechanism

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents