Skip to main content
GSA/RUgandaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Kikonda Forest Reserve

GS-1798 ↗ · current registry ID: GS2990

#52of 163 in Uganda#726of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

5.1/ 10
Integrity
5.0
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

The Kikonda Forest Reserve reforestation project has a long operational history (since 2002) and a VVB-verified investment additionality test, supported by a 20% buffer pool. However, the 2024 verification report lists over twenty material findings—including survival rates below the assumed 90%, data inconsistencies, ongoing cattle encroachment, and unresolved community conflicts—along with reversal events that were not addressed, which significantly erode confidence in the integrity and permanence of the claimed reductions.

Red Flags

  • Survival percentage in sampled areas was below the 90% used in carbon calculations, requiring a downward revision to 80% (2024 verification report).
  • Reversal events are listed as 'not addressed' in the extracted record, leaving permanence risk unquantified for this A/R project.
  • Ongoing cattle encroachment, conflicts between Forest Guards and cattle keepers, and unimplemented mitigation measures (water dams, kraal, fencing) represent a persistent threat to planted trees.
  • FPIC status is contradictory: the 2013 verification report confirms FPIC was conducted, while the 2022 PDD states it was not, creating uncertainty about free, prior, and informed consent.
  • Leakage is described as 'quantified' in the justification, yet no actual deduction percentage is stated in any available document.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2008
3,9463,9460
2009
3,6813,6810
2010
2,6642,6640
2011
19,43316,6282,805
2012
72,00871,92682
2013
40,96340,9630
2014
69,04867,0482,000
2015
133,628132,719909
2016
135,062114,57220,490
2017
137,45520,456116,999
2018
165,0900165,090
2019
219,2150219,215
2020
196,5650196,565
2021
149,8280149,828
2022
5,53405,534
Total1,354,120474,603879,517

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

Quantified justification but no stated percentage

Baseline

Project-specific baseline, reassessed 2017

Safeguards

Grievance mechanism present; FPIC status contradictory

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-05General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents