Land Life Reforestation and Restoration on Degraded Land in Australia
#188of 261 in Soil carbon#8of 14 in Australia#1143of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#76of 97 in AR-ACM0003
Audit Analysis
A registered VCS reforestation project in Australia with a 100-year crediting period and 12% buffer pool, validated by TÜV NORD CERT. However, the validation process surfaced 10 corrective action requests, a contradiction on whether FPIC was conducted, a 0% leakage deduction deemed negligible without strong justification, and no monitoring or verification data is available to confirm actual delivery. The project's additionality rests on an investment test that the VVB confirmed, but the overall evidence base remains thin and the low extraction confidence in the source documents limits assurance.
Red Flags
- FPIC status contradicts between two versions of the validation report (8 days apart); the more recent version (2026-03-24) states FPIC was NOT conducted, a significant safeguard gap for a project in Australia involving indigenous customary rights
- 10 Corrective Action Requests were raised during validation, covering geographic boundaries, indigenous rights, stakeholder engagement, grievance mechanism, additionality (natural regeneration and funding), and eligibility of formerly forested areas
- Leakage deduction of 0% is justified only as 'deemed negligible' with no quantified analysis, which is a weak basis for a 193,519 tCO2e lifetime credit claim
- No monitoring or verification reports are available; total verified ERR and monitoring period are not stated in the extracted record, so actual delivery cannot be assessed
- Low extraction confidence in the source documents reduces reliability of the structured data used for scoring
Credit Vintages
No issuances recorded on the registry.
Risk Indicators
VVB-verified investment test, but 10 CARs flagged gaps in natural regeneration and funding analysis
12% buffer pool over 100 years, but reversal events not explicitly addressed in structured record
0% deduction justified only as 'deemed negligible' without quantified analysis
Project-specific baseline; no reassessment date stated (not yet due under VCS 10-year rule)
FPIC not conducted per most recent VR; grievance mechanism present but lacked neutral third-party mediation
CORSIA eligibility not stated; CCP status not mentioned — dual-channel risk unassessed
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →