Lapwall Factory 1
Score Breakdown
Integrity
verified The verification report (2021-09-20) reports no material findings and no corrective actions required.
missing Additionality, baseline, and leakage treatment are not evidenced in the extracted record, weakening confidence in credit quantification.
Transparency
verified The VVB is identified as DNV Business Assurance Finland Oy Ab and a monitoring period is specified (2020-01-01 to 2021-06-30) in the verification report (2021-09-20).
missing Key MRV outputs (claimed/verified removals) and monitoring details (e.g., usage monitoring method) are not found in the extracted record.
Claim Safety
verified The project is marked CCP-eligible, which can reduce some buyer-side quality concerns if substantiated by the program.
missing Over-crediting risk cannot be ruled out because baseline, leakage, and verified removal totals are not available in the extracted record.
Documentation
verified A verification report dated 2021-09-20 is present and identifies the VVB (DNV).
missing Evidence document list is incomplete (listed as "unknown"), and several core fields are missing; extraction confidence is only medium.
Detailed Analysis
Integrity
The verification report (2021-09-20) indicates no material findings and no corrective actions required, which is a positive signal for process quality. However, the extracted record does not show the additionality test type or whether additionality was confirmed by the VVB, and it also lacks any baseline method or reassessment date. Leakage treatment is also not stated in available documents, and while a 10% buffer pool is listed, no reversal risk narrative or reversal event reporting is available in the extracted record.
Transparency
The verification report (2021-09-20) provides a clear monitoring period (2020-01-01 to 2021-06-30) and names the verifier (DNV Business Assurance Finland Oy Ab). However, the extracted record does not include claimed or verified net removals for that period, nor does it provide the usage monitoring method or other quantification inputs. With the evidence documents listed as "unknown," it is difficult to independently trace key assertions to specific public documents.
Claim Safety
The project is marked as CCP-eligible in the extracted record, which may support market acceptance, but the basis for that eligibility is not evidenced here. CORSIA eligibility is not stated in available documents, leaving uncertainty for aviation-claim use cases. Because baseline setting, leakage treatment, and verified removal totals are not available in the extracted record, the risk of over-crediting and therefore unsafe claims remains elevated.
Documentation
A verification report dated 2021-09-20 is present and includes the VVB name, and the record indicates two documents were used. Still, the evidence document list is not specific ("unknown"), and many core quantification and safeguards fields are not found in the extracted record. The minimum extraction confidence is medium, which suggests some limitations in document readability or extraction completeness.
Overall
No contradictions were identified in the extracted record, so there is no need to privilege one document value over another. The overall score is driven down primarily by evidence gaps on additionality, baseline, leakage, and quantified verified removals, despite the presence of a named VVB and a clean verification outcome (no material findings or corrective actions). Note: if documentation were to score below 3.0, transparency would be capped by the gate rule; and if integrity were below 4.0, the overall would be capped at 6.0—these gates are not pre-applied here.
Audit Analysis
This Puro Alternative Materials project has some credibility signals (third-party verification by DNV and no reported material findings), but key integrity-critical elements are not evidenced in the extracted record. Missing information on additionality, baseline setting, leakage treatment, and quantified verified removals materially increases over-crediting risk.
Project Description
LapWall is the builder's best friend and is also great for the environment! LapWall is a forerunning company pioneering and developing wooden elements, that has always viewed the customer as number one. Our customers greatly appreciate our company, which is among the best in the industry. Our LapWall LEKO®- element system offers the most cost-effective way to build high-quality townhouses and apartment buildings, nursing homes and day care centers, as well as business- and production buildings. We have been pioneers in our industry, bringing a more environmentally friendly, lessening the burden on the environment to build both with high quality and cost- effectiveness. LapWall has enabled growth in the Finnish market of building with wooden elements. Our industrially manufactured LEKO®- elements have succeeded in the market very well. The products of the LEKO®- element system apply excellently for both large and small construction. Currently, our factories manufactures approximately 400 000 m² of wooden elements annually. Our customers in Finland consist of all the largest constructions companies. Since the beginning of our operations, we have effectively recycled all excess material from the manufacturing process. In addition, we have continuously optimized the use of raw materials in a way that enables us to minimize the waste that results from the manufacturing process. We are the most wanted partner in our industry, that currently the demand is so high, that we cannot deliver our products to each customer that wish to acquire them. We are currently making significant investments that enable doubling the current manufacturing capacity. With these investments, the most modern and effective assembly lines will be introduced in the industry. We are also building a new factory for wooden element components, which reduces the waste of raw materials close to zero. The new factory will be able to utilize beam measurements in production that our competitors cannot us
Red Flags
- Additionality approach and whether the VVB confirmed it are not found in the extracted record.
- Baseline method and any baseline reassessment timing are not stated in available documents.
- Leakage deduction and justification are not stated in available documents.
- No claimed or verified net removals are available in the extracted record for the stated monitoring period.
Credit Vintages Exhausted
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 4,278 | 4,278 | 0 | |
| 2022 | 2,297 | 2,297 | 0 | |
| Total | 6,575 | 6,575 | 0 |
Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio
- Publish or provide extractable documentation of the additionality assessment (test type, rationale) and explicit VVB confirmation of additionality.
- Disclose the baseline approach and leakage treatment (including any deduction and justification) and report the claimed vs verified net removals for the monitoring period with supporting calculation tables.
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.
Risk Indicators
Additionality not evidenced
Buffer pool listed (10%), reversals not evidenced
Leakage treatment not stated
Baseline method not stated
Safeguards/FPIC/grievance not evidenced
CCP-eligible; CORSIA status not stated
Where to buy
Marketplaces
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Registry Documents
Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?
Correzione metadati (gratuita)
Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.
Non modifica lo score.
[email protected] →Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti
Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.
Invia Documenti →