PUR Alternative Materials Finland Documentazione completa General Methodology v2.0

Lapwall Factory 2

PUR-329175 ↗

4.3 / 10

Integrity

4.2

Transparency

4.6

Claim Safety

4.0

Documentation

4.8

Score Breakdown

Integrity

verified The verification report (2021-09-20) reports no material findings and no corrective actions required.

missing Additionality, baseline, and leakage treatment are not stated in the extracted record, weakening confidence in the credited removals.

Transparency

verified The VVB is identified as DNV – Business Assurance Finland Oy Ab and a monitoring period is provided (2020-01-01 to 2021-06-30).

missing Key MRV outputs (claimed vs verified removals) and key parameters (e.g., usage monitoring and fossil/non-fossil split method) are not stated in the extracted record.

Claim Safety

verified The project is marked CCP-eligible, which can reduce reputational risk if substantiated by the program’s governance.

missing CORSIA eligibility is not stated and core over-crediting controls (baseline, leakage, additionality) are not stated in the extracted record.

Documentation

verified A dated verification report is present (2021-09-20) and two documents were used with medium extraction confidence.

missing Evidence document list is incomplete/unclear (listed as "unknown"), and several critical fields are not stated in the extracted record.

Detailed Analysis

Integrity

The verification report (2021-09-20) indicates no material findings and no corrective actions required, which supports procedural integrity. However, the extracted record does not state the additionality test used, whether additionality was confirmed by the VVB, the baseline method, or any leakage deduction/justification. A 10% buffer pool is reported, but reversal events are not stated in the extracted record, limiting assessment of permanence risk handling.

Transparency

Transparency is moderate because the VVB is clearly identified (DNV – Business Assurance Finland Oy Ab) and the monitoring period is specified (2020-01-01—2021-06-30). At the same time, the extracted record does not provide claimed or verified total removals for the period, nor key quantification elements such as the fossil/non-fossil determination method or usage monitoring approach. The evidence document list is not informative ("unknown"), reducing traceability.

Claim Safety

Claim safety is constrained by missing core quantification and eligibility details: CORSIA eligibility is not stated in the extracted record, and baseline/leakage/additionality information is also not stated. The project is marked as CCP-eligible, which is a positive signal, but without the underlying baseline and leakage disclosures it remains difficult to rule out over-crediting risk. The absence of reported material findings in the verification report (2021-09-20) helps, but does not substitute for missing methodological specifics.

Documentation

Documentation quality is mid-range: there is a specific verification report date (2021-09-20) and two documents were used, with medium extraction confidence. However, many critical fields (additionality, baseline, leakage, quantified results) are not stated in the extracted record, and the evidence document list is effectively missing ("unknown"). No corrective actions are listed in the verification report, which supports completeness of that specific audit outcome but not overall data completeness.

Overall

No contradictions were identified in the extracted record, so scores are driven primarily by evidence gaps rather than conflicting statements. The project benefits from an identified VVB, a defined monitoring period, a stated 10% buffer, and a clean verification outcome (no material findings/corrective actions) in the verification report (2021-09-20). Overall confidence is reduced because additionality, baseline, leakage, and quantified claimed/verified removals are not stated in the extracted record, increasing uncertainty and potential over-crediting risk.

Audit Analysis

This Puro Alternative Materials project has some credibility signals (independent VVB named, no material findings, and a stated 10% buffer), but key integrity elements are missing from the extracted record. In particular, additionality, baseline approach, and leakage treatment are not stated in the available documents, which increases over-crediting risk and limits confidence in claims.

Project Description

LapWall is the builder's best friend and is also great for the environment! LapWall is a forerunning company pioneering and developing wooden elements, that has always viewed the customer as number one. Our customers greatly appreciate our company, which is among the best in the industry. Our LapWall LEKO®- element system offers the most cost-effective way to build high-quality townhouses and apartment buildings, nursing homes and day care centers, as well as business- and production buildings. We have been pioneers in our industry, bringing a more environmentally friendly, lessening the burden on the environment to build both with high quality and cost- effectiveness. LapWall has enabled growth in the Finnish market of building with wooden elements. Our industrially manufactured LEKO®- elements have succeeded in the market very well. The products of the LEKO®- element system apply excellently for both large and small construction. Currently, our factories manufactures approximately 400 000 m² of wooden elements annually. Our customers in Finland consist of all the largest constructions companies. Since the beginning of our operations, we have effectively recycled all excess material from the manufacturing process. In addition, we have continuously optimized the use of raw materials in a way that enables us to minimize the waste that results from the manufacturing process. We are the most wanted partner in our industry, that currently the demand is so high, that we cannot deliver our products to each customer that wish to acquire them. We are currently making significant investments that enable doubling the current manufacturing capacity. With these investments, the most modern and effective assembly lines will be introduced in the industry. We are also building a new factory for wooden element components, which reduces the waste of raw materials close to zero. The new factory will be able to utilize beam measurements in production that our competitors cannot us

Red Flags

Additionality approach and whether the VVB confirmed it are not stated in the extracted record.
Baseline method and any baseline reassessment timing are not stated in the extracted record.
Leakage deduction and justification are not stated in the extracted record.

Credit Vintages Exhausted

	Issued	Retired
2021	1,149	1,149
2022	673	673
Total	1,822	1,822

Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio

Disclose and cite the additionality assessment (test type and explicit VVB confirmation) and the baseline method used under the Puro methodology.
Publish the monitoring/verification quantification outputs for the period (claimed and verified removals) and the leakage approach (deduction and justification), including the fossil/non-fossil determination method and usage monitoring method.

Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.