Skip to main content
CFCUrban Forest CarbonUnited StatesGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Lee And Betty Sharp Orchard And Woods

CFC-lee-and-betty-sharp-orchard-an ↗

#13of 345 in United States#6of 59 in City Forest Credits (CFC)

6.7/ 10
Integrity
7.0
Transparency
6.0
Claim Safety
6.5
Documentation
7.5

Audit Analysis

A small urban tree-preservation project under the City Forest Credits standard with a solid verification record: combined additionality test confirmed by the VVB, a quantified 18.3% leakage deduction, a 10% buffer pool, and no reversal events or material findings. The project-specific baseline and the absence of documented FPIC or grievance-mechanism details temper the otherwise clean record. Overall a credible, low-risk credit with modest transparency gaps typical of a small CFC registration.

Red Flags

  • FPIC and grievance-mechanism details are not stated in any available document, leaving community-safeguard compliance unverified
  • Baseline is project-specific rather than jurisdictional or standardised, and no reassessment date is recorded in the extracted record

Credit Vintages

Issuance data not yet available — check back soon.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test, VVB-confirmed

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

18.3% quantified deduction

Baseline

Project-specific, no reassessment date recorded

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned; FPIC & grievance not documented

Double-claim

CCP & CORSIA status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents