Liyang 15 MW Low-concentration CMM Power Generation Project
#140of 189 in Methane#975of 1084 in China#1105of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#26of 35 in ACM0008
Audit Analysis
The Liyang CMM power generation project has VVB-verified additionality and no inherent reversal risk, but the verification report surfaced six corrective action requests including internal inconsistencies in the monitoring data and a lack of independent cross-checks. The project delivered only about 55% of the pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the three-year monitoring period, raising material over-crediting concerns. Multiple contradictions between the validation, monitoring, and verification documents further erode confidence in the data chain.
Red Flags
- Verified ERR of 757,901 tCO2e is only ~55% of the pro-rata expectation (1,368,063 tCO2e) for the 3-year monitoring period against the 4,560,209 tCO2e lifetime ex-ante estimate, indicating significant under-delivery relative to projections
- Verification report material finding: 'Actual achieved emission reductions of this monitoring period are not consistent within the monitoring report' — internal data inconsistency in the primary monitoring document
- Six corrective action requests raised during verification, including the requirement for the VVB to independently assess government authorization and provide detailed cross-verification of methane captured
- Leakage deduction of 0% with justification described as 'quantified' in the verification report but 'deemed negligible' in the monitoring report — the two characterisations are inconsistent and a 0% deduction in a CMM project warrants scrutiny
- Material finding: 'Lack of independent cross-checks and unreported data gaps' identified by the VVB during verification
- Gas capture legally mandated — additionality in doubt
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 50,000 | 107 | 49,893 | |
| 2023 | 20,000 | 0 | 20,000 | |
| 2024 | 30,000 | 0 | 30,000 | |
| Total | 100,000 | 107 | 99,893 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-verified investment test; capture legally required
Combustion-based; no storage or reversal risk
0% deduction; justification inconsistent across documents
Project-specific, modelled; reassessment not yet due
FPIC conducted; grievance mechanism present
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →