Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
Re-assessment pendingVCSEnergy demand; Energy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources)UgandaRegistry: Issuance requested

MicroEnergy Credits – Microfinance for Clean Energy Product Lines – Africa – Solar Lamps & Efficient cook stoves – 10341 –CPA - 0004

Developer: MicroEnergy Credits Corp

VCS-2838 ↗

#271of 278 in Cookstoves#180of 185 in Uganda#1586of 1608 in Verra (VCS)

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 3 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 3.1 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Analysis

This Ugandan microfinance project for solar lamps and efficient cook stoves is registered under VCS with a confirmed additionality test, but the verification report reveals an extraordinary volume of material findings (over 30) including ERR values rounded up rather than down, inconsistent baseline scenarios (charcoal vs. firewood), conflicting CDM/VCS figures, and reported reversal events from non-operational devices. The project's data quality and methodological consistency are severely compromised, raising substantial over-crediting and double-counting risks.

Red Flags

5 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 3 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 5 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 25 registry documents (25 analyzed).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Stated in the project documents

    The documents claim CORSIA eligibility, but no registry label confirms it: check vintage and authorization.

    Source: project documents (not confirmed by the registry)

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-25

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2018
54054
2019
7,080437,037
2020
13,088013,088
2021
12,982012,982
2022
11,747011,747
2023
11,580011,580
2024
11,318011,318
Total67,8494367,806

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2018–2021AMS-II.G v8.0since replaced by v14.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2018–2021AMS-III.AR v5.0since replaced by v9.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2022AMS-II.G v8.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2022AMS-III.AR v5.0since replaced by v9.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2023AMS-II.G v8.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2023AMS-III.AR v5.0since replaced by v9.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  7. 2024AMS-II.G v8.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  8. 2024AMS-III.AR v5.0since replaced by v9.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  • AMS-II.G: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on
  • AMS-III.AR: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →