Minneapolis Forest Carbon Offsets 4 Forest Carbon Offsets
#22of 345 in United States#9of 59 in City Forest Credits (CFC)
Audit Analysis
A recently verified urban forest carbon project in Minneapolis with a jurisdictional baseline, VVB-confirmed additionality, and a 5% buffer pool, but with notable gaps in leakage treatment and several sustainability indicators not stated in available documents. The first monitoring period shows verified emissions reductions roughly 5× the pro-rata ex-ante expectation, which is plausible for new plantings but warrants scrutiny. Overall a moderately strong project under the CFC standard with minor documentation issues.
Red Flags
- Leakage deduction is not stated in any available document, leaving an unquantified risk for an urban afforestation project where displaced planting or land-use change is plausible
- Verified ERR of 1,324 tCO2e in the first ~6-month monitoring period is approximately 5.2× the pro-rata ex-ante expectation (~255 tCO2e), raising a question about whether the ex-ante estimate is overly conservative or the measurement captures non-recurring establishment effects
- CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are not stated in any document, leaving dual-channel or double-claiming risk unassessed
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4,887 | 0 | 4,887 | |
| 2025 | 19,546 | 6,324 | 13,222 | |
| Total | 24,433 | 6,324 | 18,109 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
Not addressed in available documents
Jurisdictional baseline
Mentioned but FPIC and grievance mechanism not stated
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →Share this rating
