Skip to main content
CMARKReductionNetherlandsVintage 2025General Methodologyv2.1

MSR-X: Verified Polymer Substitution Emission Reductions

CMARK-5

#6of 7 in Netherlands#3of 7 in Carbonmark (CMARK)

4.5/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

The XTokenz plastics recovery and recycling project in the Netherlands has a named VVB (Control Union UK) and a 10% buffer pool, but the record is missing critical integrity parameters: the baseline method is not stated in any document, additionality verification by the VVB is unconfirmed, and the leakage justification is contradictory between the PDD and the methodology. The exact match between claimed and verified ERR (18,892.86 tCO₂e) raises questions about independent verification depth.

Red Flags

  • Baseline method is not stated in any available document (PDD, methodology, or verification report), leaving the reference scenario for the 18,892.86 tCO₂e claim unverified
  • Leakage justification is contradictory: the PDD (2025) describes it as 'quantified' while the methodology (2025-10-25) describes it as 'deemed negligible', yet the deduction is 0% in both cases
  • Claimed and verified ERR are identical (18,892.86 tCO₂e), suggesting the VVB may have confirmed the project's own calculation without independent adjustment
  • Additionality test type is listed as 'combined' but VVB confirmation of the test is not recorded in the extracted data

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Il marketplace dichiara i vintage: 2025 (non verificato).

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test stated but VVB confirmation not recorded

Permanence

reversal events not confirmed absent

Leakage

0% deduction with contradictory justifications (quantified vs. negligible)

Baseline

Baseline method not stated in any document

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism not stated

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both not stated

Where to buy

Marketplaces

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-03General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents