Vai al contenuto principale
GS avoidance Myanmar Vintage 2020, 2021 Registry: Certified & crediting Documentazione completa General Methodology v2.0

Myanmar Stoves Campaign

GS-1496 ↗

5.1 / 10
Integrity
5.1
Transparency
5.8
Claim Safety
3.7
Documentation
6.0

Score Breakdown

Integrity

verified The project uses an investment test for additionality and the monitoring record shows a quantified leakage deduction of 5%.

missing The verification report did not confirm additionality, and reversal events are not addressed; the buffer pool is also not stated.

Transparency

verified The project has a named VVB, SustainCERT, and the monitoring period is clearly stated for 2022-01-01 to 2023-06-30.

missing The claimed versus verified emission reduction figures differ sharply, and the record does not state CORSIA eligibility or CCP status.

Claim Safety

verified Leakage is at least explicitly quantified at 5%, and the project is a cookstove avoidance activity with a national default FNRB value of 0.95.

missing The verified usage rate is low at 52.63%, and the contradiction with an earlier 99.1% usage figure increases over-crediting risk.

Documentation

verified The record draws on many documents, including a verification report, monitoring report, validation report, PDD, and stakeholder consultation materials.

missing The extraction confidence is only medium, several key fields are missing or not stated, and the crediting period end date is not specified.

Detailed Analysis

Integrity

The project has some positive integrity signals: the documents describe an investment test for additionality, and the monitoring information includes a quantified leakage deduction of 5%. However, the verification report did not confirm additionality, reversal events are listed as not addressed, and the buffer pool percentage is not found in the extracted record. The baseline is project-specific rather than a clearly reassessed standardized baseline, which weakens robustness.

Transparency

Transparency is moderate because the VVB is identified as SustainCERT and the monitoring period is clearly stated as 2022-01-01 to 2023-06-30. At the same time, the record shows a large gap between claimed and verified emission reductions, and CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are not stated in available documents. The monitoring approach is present, but the overall registry and public-claim picture is incomplete.

Claim Safety

Claim safety is weakened by the low verified usage rate of 52.63%, which is especially concerning for a cookstove project where usage drives actual climate benefit. The record also contains a contradiction showing an earlier usage figure of 99.1%, so I privilege the later 2021 monitoring value because it is more recent and appears to reflect updated field data. Leakage is at least quantified, but the combination of low usage and unresolved reversal treatment raises over-crediting risk.

Documentation

Documentation is reasonably broad, with 27 documents used and evidence from a verification report, monitoring report, validation report, PDD, stakeholder consultation, and appendix materials. Still, the extraction confidence is only medium, which suggests at least one key document was not fully readable, and several important items are not stated, including the buffer pool and the end of the crediting period. The presence of corrective actions is clean, but the record is not fully complete.

Overall

I privileged the later monitoring-report values where contradictions exist, because they are more recent and likely reflect updated field measurements: the 2021 usage rate of 52.63% over the older 99.1% figure, the investment-test framing over the earlier barrier-test reference, and the verification report’s statement that additionality was not confirmed over the later conflicting claim. These contradictions reduce reliability and justify a downward adjustment in confidence and score. The project remains usable as a certified avoidance project, but the evidence does not support a high-confidence, high-integrity crediting claim.

Audit Analysis

This is a certified Gold Standard cookstove project with some solid safeguards and a quantified leakage deduction, but the evidence base has important reliability issues. The biggest concern is that the verified usage rate is only 52.63%, while the record also shows a much higher earlier figure, and additionality was not confirmed by the VVB in the verification report. Overall, the project looks plausible but not especially strong on crediting robustness.

Project Description

The Myanmar Stoves Campaign, a Sonu and Eva Foundation program, is the first Gold Standard certified carbon project in Myanmar.  The 60,000  fuel efficient stoves sold to date have improved the lives of over 285,000  people. Myanmar is the third largest contributor to deforestation worldwide. As the forests disappear, the price of wood gets higher, driving more and more families into energy poverty. Cutting expenditures on wood makes a huge difference to families already living in poverty, and reducing the time needed to forage for wood means more time to spend on smallholdings and on securing a good harvest. Rural families in Myanmar spend as much as 40% of their income – or the time equivalent – on purchasing or collecting firewood. Indoor cooking on inefficient stoves is a silent killer. Air pollution from domestic cooking is responsible for the premature deaths of over 4 million people a year—more than HIV Aids and malaria combined. Each cook stove reduces wood consumption by at least 50%, reducing both pressure on forests and household expenditure on fuel. Air pollution is reduced by 80%, improving the health and safety of the whole community. Carbon emissions are reduced by 60%, or four tons per year, per stove. The Myanmar Stoves Campaign is a project of the Sonu and Eva Foundation. The Sonu and Eva Foundation acts as the project developer, coordinator and manager. Mercy Corps Myanmar is the local implementation partner. The Sonu and Eva Foundation supports the development of environmental projects that reduce carbon emissions at the same time as addressing deeper social and environmental challenges. Using innovative impact investing principles, projects produce their own financial returns which are used to further scale reach and impact. Project impacts and benefits: Over 60,000 stoves sold to households in rural Myanmar. Over 285,000 people benefits from lower energy costs and reduced indoor smoke. Over 1,000 vendors traine

Red Flags

  • The verified usage rate is only 52.63%, and the record contains a contradictory earlier usage figure of 99.1%, which raises over-crediting concerns.
  • Additionality was based on an investment test, but the verification report did not confirm it, and reversal risk is not addressed.

Credit Vintages

Issued Retired Available
2017
4,545 4,545 0
2018
8,543 8,543 0
2019
8,048 8,048 0
2020
5,732 5,213 519
2021
1,670 0 1,670
Total 28,538 26,349 2,189

Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio

  • Provide a clear, VVB-confirmed additionality assessment and reconcile the conflicting additionality references across documents.
  • Publish a complete monitoring and registry package showing the latest verified usage rate, reversal treatment, buffer pool coverage, and CORSIA/CCP status.

Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test present but not VVB-confirmed

Permanence

Avoidance project, but reversal risk not addressed

Leakage

Leakage quantified at 5%

Baseline

Project baseline stated, reassessment timing missing

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, and benefit sharing documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

Marketplaces

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis Provenance Scored 2026-04-14 General Methodology v2.0 Documentazione completa

Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?

Correzione metadati (gratuita)

Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.

Non modifica lo score.

[email protected]

Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti

Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.

Invia Documenti