Skip to main content
VCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources); Waste handling and disposalChina Registry: RegisteredACM0001

Nanning Landfill Gas Power Generation Project

VCS-2464 ↗

#109of 189 in Methane#853of 1084 in China#962of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#101of 159 in ACM0001

4.6/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

The Nanning Landfill Gas Power Generation Project has a sound fundamental design with VVB-confirmed additionality and no reversal events, but the verification report identified seven material findings and nine corrective actions related to data gaps, calculation transparency, and calibration deficiencies. The project delivered only about 52% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the 18-month monitoring period, and leakage was not properly addressed in the verification report. Overall, the project is functional but carries meaningful MRV quality and documentation risks.

Red Flags

  • Seven material findings in the 2025 verification report, including missing hourly data records, lack of transparency in emission reduction calculations, and absence of recent calibration certificates for monitoring equipment
  • Nine corrective actions required, spanning data substitution methods, calculation traceability, methane destruction evidence, and incomplete monitoring plan procedures
  • Leakage deduction of 0% with justification recorded as 'not addressed' in the verification report, while the monitoring report claims it was 'deemed negligible' — an unresolved inconsistency
  • FPIC status contradicts between the verification report (conducted) and the monitoring report (not conducted), creating uncertainty on free, prior, and informed consent

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2020
117,275117,17897
2021
257,519257,5190
2022
266,529266,5290
2023
157,529157,5290
Total798,852798,75597

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deduction, justification inconsistent across documents

Baseline

Project-specific; measured vs modeled discrepancy

Safeguards

FPIC contradiction; grievance mechanism present

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-03ACM0001

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents