Nanyang Danjiang River Solar Cooker Project Phase II(Pre-cdm clone)
GS-304 ↗ · current registry ID: GS2092
#130of 150 in Cookstoves#976of 1084 in China#1527of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)#73of 115 in AMS-I.C
Audit Analysis
This CDM-era solar cooker project in China has a confirmed investment-test additionality but is undermined by an extensive list of material findings (calculation errors, formula inconsistencies, data-entry mistakes) and 30+ corrective actions across multiple monitoring cycles. The absence of a buffer pool, a project-specific baseline, and a 0% leakage deduction with a contradictory justification history raise meaningful integrity and over-crediting concerns. The project delivered roughly 89% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the elapsed monitoring period, which is within a reasonable band but does not offset the quality-control weaknesses.
Red Flags
- 30+ corrective actions and 25+ material findings across verification and monitoring reports indicate systemic quality-control failures in MRV calculations and data handling
- No buffer pool or permanence mechanism is stated in any available document, leaving reversal risk unaddressed for a 10-year crediting period
- Leakage deduction is 0% with a 'quantified' justification in the 2020 verification report, yet the 2014 verification report recorded leakage as 'not addressed' — the basis for the zero deduction is not transparently documented
- Contradiction in claimed ERR: the monitoring report (Oct 2020) states 119,046 tCO₂e while the verification report (Aug 2020) states 133,091 tCO₂e for the same period, a 12% discrepancy
- Usage monitoring method is described as 'annual survey' in the verification report but 'self-report' in the monitoring report, creating ambiguity about data reliability
Credit Vintages Exhausted
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 33,102 | 33,102 | 0 | |
| 2012 | 61,914 | 61,914 | 0 | |
| Total | 95,016 | 95,016 | 0 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
0% deduction; justification inconsistent across reports
Project-specific; no reassessment date stated
Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism not stated
CORSIA and CCP status not stated; dual-channel risk unconfirmed
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →