Northern Cheyenne Reforestation
#27of 38 in ARR (afforestation)#100of 115 in United States#38of 45 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)
Audit Analysis
The project currently relies solely on a pre-crediting design document with no independent verification or monitoring data available. Critical metrics such as additionality testing, baseline scenarios, and leakage assumptions remain entirely unquantified, resulting in low confidence across all quality dimensions.
Red Flags
- Complete absence of verified additionality assessment and baseline methodology
- No monitoring reports or emission reduction figures to validate project performance
- Unconfirmed CORSIA and CCP eligibility leaves double-counting risks unresolved
- Leakage not addressed in project documentation
- Buffer pool size not disclosed in available documents
Credit Vintages
No issuances recorded on the registry.
Risk Indicators
Unverified
Buffer unconfirmed
Untreated
Undefined
Undocumented
Status unknown
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →Share this rating
