Skip to main content
PURremovalGermanyGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Novocarbo Ruhr/Tyssenkrupp

PUR-798006 ↗

#6of 61 in Biochar#1of 7 in Germany#21of 111 in Puro.earth (PUR)

5.3/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

The Novocarbo Ruhr/Tyssenkrupp biochar project demonstrates a solid additionality case (investment test confirmed by bio.inspecta AG) and a 14% buffer pool, but four material findings from the 2024 verification report — including an unverifiable supplier chain, inconsistent carbon-content data, and a significant LCA distance discrepancy (394 km vs. 1,184 km) — raise meaningful over-crediting risk. Several key parameters (leakage deduction, usage rates, baseline reassessment date, CORSIA/CCP status) are absent from the extracted record, limiting confidence in the net credit figure.

Red Flags

  • LCA transport distance to end consumer is 394 km in the project document but 1,184 km per Google Maps — a ~3× discrepancy that could materially inflate the net credit
  • The verification report (2024-09-25) could not establish a clear link between the certificate holder and the end supplier UMWELTKONTOR, undermining the chain-of-custody claim
  • Carbon content from a less-accurate pilot-stage analysis was used instead of the lower, more reliable post-pilot value, potentially overstating sequestration
  • FNRB method is contradictory within the same verification report: listed as both 'not applicable' and 'local field', making the 0.86 value's derivation unclear

Credit Vintages Exhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2023
3393390
2024
12120
Total3513510

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test, VVB-confirmed, no legal obligation

Permanence

14% buffer, 100-yr claim, no reversal data

Leakage

Quantified justification, no specific % stated

Baseline

Project-specific, no reassessment date

Safeguards

Mentioned but FPIC and grievance undocumented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

Marketplaces

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-03General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents