PoA GS11815- Electric Cooking Program by ATEC - Electric Cooking Program in Bangladesh by ATEC-VPA02
GS-3838 ↗ · current registry ID: GS11817
#156of 1329 in Industrial#27of 121 in Bangladesh#284of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)
Audit Analysis
The ATEC electric cooking program in Bangladesh is a Gold Standard energy-efficiency project with smart-meter monitoring and a VVB-confirmed additionality assessment, but it carries moderate risks from a project-specific baseline, a 0% leakage deduction, and several unresolved data contradictions across documents. The verified ERR of 1,667 tCO2e for the ~9-month monitoring period is consistent with the latest verification report, though earlier documents reported higher figures, raising data-reliability questions. Overall, the project is functional but lacks the robustness of a jurisdictional baseline, a buffer pool, or fully resolved monitoring findings.
Red Flags
- Seven contradictions across documents (leakage justification, ERR figures, fNRB value, FPIC status, fNRB method, crediting period) indicate inconsistent record-keeping between the PDD, monitoring report, and successive verification reports.
- No buffer pool is stated in any available document, leaving no financial backstop against potential reversal or under-delivery.
- Leakage deduction is 0% with a justification described as 'quantified' in the 2026 verification report but 'deemed negligible' in the 2025 report — the basis for the zero deduction is not transparently explained.
- Two findings (FAR 1 and FAR 2) regarding energy use of the digital monitoring infrastructure and data-security/GDPR compliance remain open in the 2026 verification report.
- The additionality test type is not specified in the extracted record; only the VVB's confirmation is documented, limiting the ability to assess the robustness of the additionality claim.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 608 | 0 | 608 | |
| 2023 | 1,944 | 0 | 1,944 | |
| 2024 | 1,060 | 0 | 1,060 | |
| Total | 3,612 | 0 | 3,612 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed but test type unspecified
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
0% deduction, justification inconsistent across reports
Project-specific, no reassessment date found
FPIC and grievance mechanism present but FPIC status contradicted
CCP and CORSIA statuses not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →