Programa de aprovechamiento de gas asociado de Ecopetrol
#126of 189 in Methane#98of 124 in Colombia#73of 99 in CerCarbono (CC)
Audit Analysis
Ecopetrol's associated gas utilization project in Colombia has VVB-verified additionality and a legally mandated capture requirement, but is undermined by a project-specific baseline established after the crediting period began, a 0% buffer pool, unaddressed leakage, and seven material findings requiring corrective action. The verified emissions reductions (20,835 tCO2e) represent roughly 66% of the pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the elapsed monitoring period, which is conservative. Multiple contradictions across documents—particularly in ERR figures, leakage treatment, and safeguards—reduce confidence in the data record.
Red Flags
- Seven material findings in the verification report, including baseline deviation at La Cañada, incorrect electricity generation data for Orito, and wrong grid emission factor applied—each requiring corrective action
- 0% buffer pool with no quantified leakage deduction and leakage justification marked 'not addressed' in the most recent verification report (Oct 2022)
- PDD dated January 2021 post-dates the crediting period start of November 2019, meaning the project was operational before its design document was finalized
- ERR figures differ by 40% between the verification report (34,912 tCO2e) and the final issuance record (20,835 tCO2e), indicating significant post-verification corrections
- Safeguards documentation is contradictory: one verification report (Oct 2022) states safeguards are mentioned, the more recent one (Nov 2022) states they are not; FPIC status is not found in any document
- Gas capture legally mandated — additionality in doubt
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 9,982 | 3,544 | 6,438 | |
| 2020 | 34,912 | 0 | 34,912 | |
| Total | 44,894 | 3,544 | 41,350 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-verified combined test; legally required capture
gas-utilization project with lower reversal risk but no contingency
0% deduction; justification not addressed in latest report
Project-specific, measured; PDD post-dates crediting period start
Grievance mechanism present; FPIC and safeguards documentation inconsistent
CORSIA and CCP status both unstated; dual-channel risk unassessed
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →