Skip to main content
CCLand use (AFOLU)BrazilGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Projeto Agrupado Itxawa REDD+

ECO-172 ↗

#50of 145 in REDD+#55of 211 in Brazil#30of 99 in CerCarbono (CC)

5.4/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

The Itxawa REDD+ project has a structurally sound design with a jurisdictional baseline, VVB-confirmed additionality, a 7.3% buffer pool, and no reversal events. However, the initial baseline underestimated reference-region deforestation by roughly 300%, 26 findings (25 corrective actions) required four rounds of review, and one prior-consultation finding remains open, collectively undermining confidence in the robustness of the underlying assumptions. The project delivered approximately 82% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the elapsed monitoring period, indicating no over-crediting but also a modest shortfall.

Red Flags

  • Deforestation in the reference region was approximately 300% higher than the initial baseline estimate, indicating a significant underestimation of business-as-usual pressure that was only corrected during verification
  • 6 hectares of forest were converted within the project area due to infrastructure expansion, representing a direct loss of the conservation asset
  • One Future Action Request (FAR) related to the prior consultation process remains open, leaving a safeguards gap unresolved
  • Multiple contradictions exist between the PDD, validation report, and verification report on baseline method, additionality test type, FPIC status, and ERR figures, reducing data reliability

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2018
7520752
2019
1110111
2020
1210121
2021
3000300
2022
1210121
2023
1200120
Total1,52501,525

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

Avoidance project, 7.3% buffer, no reversals

Leakage

0% deduction, justified as quantified/negligible

Baseline

Jurisdictional but initial estimate ~300% low; reassessed 2023

Safeguards

FPIC and grievance mechanism present; 1 FAR open on prior consultation

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents