Skip to main content
CCLand use (AFOLU)ColombiaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Proyecto REDD+ Zona Isana y Surubi

ECO-67 ↗

#27of 99 in REDD+#21of 124 in Colombia#21of 99 in CerCarbono (CC)

5.6/ 10
Integrity
5.8
Transparency
5.2
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
5.8

Audit Analysis

A Colombian REDD+ avoidance project with a jurisdictional baseline, VVB-verified barrier additionality test, and a 5% buffer pool, but undermined by seven material findings (three corrective action requests), unresolved reversal-risk language, and contradictory figures across documents for the buffer rate and ERR values. The project delivered roughly 89% of its pro-rata lifetime expectation for the 2021–2022 monitoring period, indicating conservative crediting, yet several key MRV parameters (FNRB, usage rate, leakage deduction percentage) remain unstated.

Red Flags

  • Seven material findings in the 2025 verification report, including three Corrective Action Requests covering benefit-sharing clarity, deforestation-cause analysis, and prior-consultation documentation
  • Reversal events described as 'not addressed' in the February 2025 verification report, despite the project being a 20-year REDD+ avoidance scheme
  • Buffer pool percentage contradicts between the December 2024 verification report (11.2%) and the February 2025 verification report (5.0%)
  • Claimed and verified ERR figures appear swapped between the verification report and the issuance document (493,667 vs 438,376 tCO2e)

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2018
1,68201,682
2019
1,45701,457
2020
34034
2021
3,79403,794
2022
1,51601,516
Total8,48308,483

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Barrier test, VVB-verified

Permanence

Buffer present but reversals 'not addressed'

Leakage

Quantified but deduction % unstated

Baseline

Jurisdictional per 2025 VR; PDD says project-specific

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents