RDIS Carbon Emission Reduction for Self-Sustainable Environmental Care
GS-855 ↗ · current registry ID: GS4823
#322of 1329 in Industrial#25of 139 in Rwanda#529of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)#63of 189 in AMS-II.G
Audit Analysis
A Gold Standard domestic energy-efficiency stove project in Rwanda with VVB-confirmed additionality and no reversal events, but undermined by ten material findings (including a 65% baseline parameter correction), nine required corrective actions, and seven cross-document contradictions. The project delivered only ~39% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the monitored period, which is conservative but raises questions about the accuracy of the original estimate. Documentation quality is weakened by low extraction confidence and PDD versioning errors.
Red Flags
- Baseline fuel-consumption parameter corrected from 187 to 308 kg/month/HH (a 65% increase) due to a CME error, fundamentally altering the ex-ante estimate
- Biennial monitoring frequency not followed for RDIS Rwanda and Aid Africa Uganda CPAs; a conservative approach was applied but the gap is unquantified
- Seven contradictions across documents, including conflicting ERR figures (7,635 vs 57,656), fNRB values (0.88 vs 0.77), and leakage deduction units (0.95 vs 5)
- PDD version 1.0 incorrectly referenced AMS-II.G version 11.1 instead of the applicable version 03, and ex-ante values were inconsistent with the VER spreadsheet
- CCP and CORSIA eligibility status not stated in any available document, leaving dual-channel risk unassessed
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 133 | 0 | 133 | |
| 2018 | 3,845 | 0 | 3,845 | |
| 2019 | 3,657 | 0 | 3,657 | |
| Total | 7,635 | 0 | 7,635 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
Avoidance project, no reversals
Quantified 5% deduction
Project-specific, 65% parameter correction
FPIC, grievance, benefit sharing
CCP and CORSIA status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →