Recycling Roadways for Carbon Emission Reductions – Global Emissionairy – U.S. Project #1
#237of 345 in United States#1048of 1339 in Verra (VCS)
Audit Analysis
This VCS construction project (VM0039, roadway recycling) has a VVB-confirmed additionality assessment and no reported reversal events, but is undermined by numerous material findings, contradictory data between the verification report and monitoring report, a 0% leakage deduction lacking clear justification, and a significant under-delivery of only ~20% of the pro-rata lifetime expectation for the elapsed monitoring period. The low extraction confidence and 12 outstanding corrective actions further erode confidence in the project's data integrity.
Red Flags
- Project delivered only ~20% of the pro-rata lifetime expectation (21,116 tCO2e verified vs ~104,900 tCO2e expected for the 22-month monitoring period out of the 400,616 tCO2e PDD lifetime estimate), raising questions about baseline validity or project activity levels
- 11 material findings and 12 corrective actions remain open, including insufficient evidence on double-counting avoidance with constructors and unclear additionality (FSB vs asphalt emulsion)
- Leakage deduction of 0% with contradictory justification: the verification report states leakage was 'not addressed' while the monitoring report claims it was 'deemed negligible'
- Additionality test type is inconsistent: the verification report identifies a 'performance' test while the monitoring report references a 'combined' test
- CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are not stated in any available document, leaving dual-channel risk unassessed
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 10,532 | 1,079 | 9,453 | |
| 2022 | 10,584 | 4,259 | 6,325 | |
| Total | 21,116 | 5,338 | 15,778 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed but test type contradictory; FSB vs emulsion unresolved
No reversals reported
0% deduction; justification contradictory across documents
Project-specific; no reassessment date; under-delivery questions validity
FPIC and grievance mechanism present; no-net-harm and consultation gaps flagged
CORSIA and CCP status not stated; double-counting with constructors flagged
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →