Safe Water Programme – Kenya - VPA 56

Audit Analysis

The Safe Water Programme in Kenya has VVB-confirmed additionality and a named verification body, but suffers from a project-specific baseline with no stated reassessment date, a 0% leakage deduction whose justification is contradictory across documents, and a material finding that actual emission reductions fall below ex-ante estimates. The absence of a buffer pool, combined with six outstanding corrective actions on monitoring methodology, leaves meaningful gaps in permanence and over-crediting safeguards.

Project Description

Red Flags

• ⚠Material finding in the verification report states actual emission reductions are lower than ex-ante estimates in the registered PDD, yet the verified figure (1,023,164) exactly matches the claimed figure, raising questions about whether the verification independently recalculated reductions.
• ⚠Leakage deduction is 0% with the verification report recording the justification as 'not addressed,' while the monitoring report claims it was 'deemed negligible' — a direct contradiction that weakens the leakage treatment.
• ⚠Six corrective actions remain open, including requirements to justify monitoring gaps, eliminate potential bias in chlorine tablet usage, and collect signed population confirmations from each institution.

Credit Vintages