Skip to main content
VCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources); Waste handling and disposalUnited Arab Emirates Registry: RegisteredACM0022

Sharjah Waste to Energy Plant project

VCS-4262 ↗

#9of 9 in United Arab Emirates#1263of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#28of 31 in ACM0022

3.4/ 10
Integrity
3.5
Transparency
3.0
Claim Safety
3.5
Documentation
3.5

Audit Analysis

The Sharjah Waste-to-Energy project has a VVB-verified additionality assessment and a registered VCS status, but is undermined by a severe discrepancy in lifetime emissions reductions (471,870 tCO₂e in the validation report versus 2,698,190 tCO₂e in the PDD), five material findings with required corrective actions, a 0% leakage deduction for a WTE project, and the absence of feedstock sustainability data, an LCA, or any buffer pool. The low extraction confidence and lack of monitoring-period data further limit confidence in the project's claims.

Red Flags

  • Lifetime ERR differs by a factor of ~5.7 between the PDD (2,698,190 tCO₂e) and the validation report (471,870 tCO₂e); the basis for this reduction is not explained in the extracted record
  • Five material findings and five corrective actions remain open, including unresolved ownership-structure ambiguity, an unassessed MCF default of 1.0, and a capacity discrepancy (35.37 MW vs 26–29 MW in the ESIA)
  • Zero leakage deduction for a waste-to-energy project with only a 'quantified' label; the PDD characterises leakage as 'deemed negligible', creating an inconsistency in the justification
  • No feedstock sustainability assessment, no life-cycle analysis, and no carbon-content testing are present in the extracted record for a WTE project
  • No buffer pool percentage is stated and no reversal events are reported, leaving permanence risk unquantified

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-verified combined test

Permanence

no reversal data

Leakage

0% deduction; justification inconsistent across docs

Baseline

Project-specific; no reassessment date recorded

Safeguards

FPIC and grievance mechanism present; stakeholder-engagement

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-29ACM0022

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents