Vai al contenuto principale
GS avoidance Vintage 2022 Registry: Certified & crediting Documentazione completa General Methodology v2.0

Solar Cooking for Refugee Families in Chad

GS-1609 ↗

6.0 / 10
Integrity
6.8
Transparency
6.1
Claim Safety
4.7
Documentation
6.4

Score Breakdown

Integrity

verified Additionality was confirmed by the VVB, and the latest monitoring report reports no material findings and no corrective actions required.

missing The project relies on a project-specific cookstove methodology with no baseline method or reassessment details stated in the extracted record.

Transparency

verified The monitoring report provides a named VVB, a defined monitoring period, and quantified claimed versus verified ERs.

missing Public-facing completeness is weakened by missing baseline details, no buffer pool information, and unresolved contradictions in key monitoring inputs.

Claim Safety

verified Leakage is quantified at 5%, and the project is a Gold Standard certified avoidance project rather than a removal project.

missing The latest monitoring report shows 15,169 verified ERs against 40,596 claimed ERs, which is a very large gap and raises over-crediting concerns.

Documentation

verified The record draws on multiple document types, including a monitoring report, PDD, appendix, and stakeholder consultation materials.

missing Some extracted fields are not stated, and the record contains contradictory values across documents, which lowers confidence in the documentation trail.

Detailed Analysis

Integrity

The latest monitoring report confirms additionality through the VVB and reports no material findings or corrective actions required, which supports the project’s core integrity. Leakage is addressed with a quantified deduction of 5%, but the baseline method is not stated in the extracted record and buffer pool information is missing, leaving permanence and baseline robustness only partially evidenced. The project is an avoidance activity, so reversal risk is inherently lower than for removals, but the absence of buffer details still limits confidence.

Transparency

Transparency is moderate because the monitoring report names Carbon Check (India) Private Ltd., specifies the 2024 monitoring period, and reports both claimed and verified ER totals. However, the extracted record does not state the baseline method, baseline reassessment timing, or buffer pool percentage, and those omissions weaken MRV completeness. The presence of multiple contradictory values across documents also reduces the clarity and auditability of the public record.

Claim Safety

Claim safety is constrained by the large gap between 40,596 claimed ERs and 15,169 verified ERs in the latest monitoring report, which suggests substantial over-claim risk or a major downward verification adjustment. The project is Gold Standard certified and uses a quantified leakage deduction, which is positive, but the usage rate and FNRB history are inconsistent across documents. Because the record does not state CORSIA eligibility or CCP status, dual-market risk cannot be ruled out from the extracted facts alone.

Documentation

Documentation is reasonably broad, with 15 documents used and evidence from a monitoring report, PDD, appendix, and stakeholder consultation materials. Extraction confidence is high, which helps, and the latest report is recent relative to the crediting period. Still, several key fields are not stated, and the contradictions in usage rate, FNRB, ER totals, and crediting period indicate that the documentary trail is not fully consistent.

Overall

I privileged the most recent monitoring report for the latest values on usage rate, FNRB, and verified ERs because it is the newest and most project-specific source, while noting that older appendix and prior monitoring values conflict with it. The contradiction on verified ERs is especially important: the latest report’s 15,169 verified ERs is lower than the earlier 13,119 figure from 2023, and the project also shows a much larger claimed total of 40,596, so I reduced claim-safety and documentation confidence accordingly. The crediting period contradiction was resolved in favor of the later period stated in the monitoring report, but the existence of conflicting historical periods still signals reliability risk.

Audit Analysis

This is a certified Gold Standard cookstove project with VVB-confirmed additionality, quantified leakage deduction, and no material findings reported in the latest monitoring record. However, the evidence base has several reliability issues, including major contradictions in usage rates, FNRB, credited ERs, and crediting period history, which reduce confidence in the claimed volume and the robustness of the documentation.

Project Description

Since the war in Sudan, more than 1 million Sudanese have fled to neighboring Chad; a doubling compared to early 2023. These refugees have sometimes been living in refugee camps in the border region for more than 15 years. Women and children often have to travel long distances to collect wood and are regularly harassed, assaulted, kidnapped or, in the worst case, never return at all. To do something about this problem, the introduction of the CooKit Solar Cooker in six refugee camps began in 2005. The CooKit is a solar cooker that can be used for cooking using solar energy. By using the CooKit, women and children no longer have to leave the camp to get wood. This means a significant improvement in the safety of the women and a clean and healthy smoke-free way of cooking. FairClimateFund is providing them with the necessary material, knowledge and training to manufacture their own solar cooker and to prepare their meals using energy from the sun. At the moment, over 10.000 families in the refugee camps have been equipped with solar cookers made out of cardboard and aluminum foil that, when folded in a semi-parabolic form can be used to heat water and cook entire meals. Due to the omnipresence of sun in this region, the cooker can be used 330 days out of the year, thus almost completely eliminating the need for firewood. This project not only eliminates the danger of women exposing themselves to physical harm, but also verifiably improves health conditions, especially among women and children, because cooking with solar energy is smokeless. Furthermore, it empowers the women by giving them a viable role in the project, and without the need to collect firewood women have more time to pursue handcrafting or other jobs and children to attend school. Project impacts and benefits: SDG 1 - No Poverty: Empowers women - hundreds of new jobs for women in the camps, development of skills on how to manufacture their own solar cookers and how to manage and t

Red Flags

  • Large discrepancies across documents on usage rate, FNRB, credited emissions reductions, and crediting period suggest inconsistent reporting history.
  • The latest monitoring report shows verified ERs far below claimed ERs, indicating a substantial over-claim risk or a major adjustment in the verification process.

Credit Vintages

Issued Retired Available
2012
9,043 8,914 129
2013
8,999 8,820 179
2014
9,026 8,976 50
2015
9,024 8,720 304
2016
6,892 6,802 90
2017
4,511 4,511 0
2018
4,776 4,193 583
2019
7,700 7,518 182
2020
7,683 6,099 1,584
2021
8,538 6,881 1,657
2022
10,000 1,614 8,386
2023
10,000 0 10,000
2024
6,137 0 6,137
Total 102,329 73,048 29,281

Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio

  • Publish a clear baseline description and the latest reassessment rationale, including how the FNRB and usage assumptions were derived.
  • Reconcile the contradictory ER, usage-rate, FNRB, and crediting-period values in a single audited reconciliation table.

Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed additionality

Permanence

Avoidance project, buffer not stated

Leakage

5% quantified leakage deduction

Baseline

Baseline method not stated

Safeguards

FPIC and grievance mechanism present

Double-claim

CORSIA/CCP status not stated

Where to buy

Marketplaces

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis Provenance Scored 2026-04-14 General Methodology v2.0 Documentazione completa

Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?

Correzione metadati (gratuita)

Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.

Non modifica lo score.

[email protected]

Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti

Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.

Invia Documenti