Southington Township Trumbull County Forest Carbon Offsets
#28of 345 in United States#13of 59 in City Forest Credits (CFC)
Audit Analysis
A 40-year urban tree preservation project under the City Forest Credits standard with a VVB-verified combined additionality test, a 10% buffer pool, and a conservative 18.3% quantified leakage deduction. The verified ERR (6,216 tCO₂e) is lower than the PDD estimate (6,906), indicating a conservative outcome. Key gaps include the absence of documented FPIC, a grievance mechanism, and baseline reassessment timing, as well as the use of a project-specific rather than jurisdictional baseline.
Red Flags
- ERR contradiction: the PDD (Jan 2024) states 6,906 tCO₂e while the verification report (May 2024) confirms 6,216 tCO₂e — a ~10% reduction that, while conservative, signals an initial over-estimate in the project design
- No FPIC or grievance mechanism is documented in the extracted record, despite the project affecting a public forest preserve in a US township
- Baseline is project-specific with no stated reassessment date, and the CFC standard's baseline reassessment cadence is not clearly documented in the available files
- CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are not stated, leaving dual-channel risk unassessed
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6,216 | 0 | 6,216 | |
| Total | 6,216 | 0 | 6,216 |
Risk Indicators
Combined test, VVB-verified
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
18.3% quantified deduction
Project-specific, reassessment timing not stated
Safeguards mentioned, benefit sharing described, but no FPIC or grievance mechanism documented
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →