Sustainable Agroforestry Cacao Meta, Colombia
#49of 261 in Soil carbon#35of 124 in Colombia#487of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#17of 97 in AR-ACM0003
Audit Analysis
The Sustainable Agroforestry Cacao Meta project has a solid core design with VVB-verified additionality, a 26% buffer pool, and no reported reversal events. However, the verification process surfaced 6 critical-level findings, 18 corrective actions, and 2 further actions, alongside a project-specific baseline and a 0% leakage deduction justified only as 'deemed negligible.' The ERR figures also show a material discrepancy between the monitoring report and verification report, reducing confidence in the reported credit volume.
Red Flags
- 6 critical-level findings, 18 corrective actions, and 2 further actions raised during verification — an unusually high number indicating significant documentation and design gaps
- ERR discrepancy: the monitoring report reports 56,103 tCO₂e while the verification report (same date, 2025-07-31) reports 41,516 tCO₂e — a 26% gap unexplained in the extracted record
- 0% leakage deduction justified only as 'deemed negligible' in the validation report, while the PDD (2024) described leakage as 'quantified' — the contradiction is unresolved
- Project-specific baseline rather than a jurisdictional or standardised baseline, with no recorded reassessment date
- CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are not stated in any available document, leaving dual-channel risk unassessed
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 5,000 | 0 | 5,000 | |
| Total | 5,000 | 0 | 5,000 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-verified investment test
26% buffer, no reversals, replanting plan
0% deduction, 'deemed negligible', PDD contradiction
Project-specific, reassessment not yet due
FPIC and grievance present, but 18+ CARs on engagement
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →