Tavolo Community Forest Conservation Project
#169of 261 in Soil carbon#1081of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#16of 27 in VM0007
Audit Analysis
The Tavolo Community Forest Conservation Project is a VCS ALM project in Papua New Guinea with a 17% buffer pool and VVB-confirmed additionality, but it is burdened by serious land-tenure disputes (SABL/FCA nullification), a 0% leakage deduction with contradictory justifications across documents, and 28 corrective actions flagged by the VVB. The project delivered roughly 360% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the first monitoring period, suggesting a conservative baseline, yet the unresolved ownership conflicts and insufficient non-permanence and leakage assessments create material integrity risk.
Red Flags
- Ongoing land-tenure disputes with Kakuna-Lote Resource Development Ltd and Mekar (PNG) Ltd over SABL/FCA issuance; court order of 20 Oct 2022 stayed the FCA pending nullification, but resolution is not yet confirmed in the record.
- Leakage deduction of 0% is justified as 'quantified' in the verification report but as 'deemed negligible' in the validation report, and the VVB material findings explicitly note insufficient demonstration of no leakage from activity shifting and market effects.
- 28 corrective actions were required by the VVB, spanning additionality, baseline, leakage, non-permanence, double-counting, and safeguards — indicating systemic documentation and methodological gaps.
- 15.2 ha of forest cover loss was detected during the 2019–2022 monitoring period, partially offsetting claimed reductions.
- Risk of double counting with national REDD+ Results Units was flagged as insufficiently assessed in the verification report.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 28,345 | 2,630 | 25,715 | |
| 2021 | 8,000 | 0 | 8,000 | |
| Total | 36,345 | 2,630 | 33,715 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed but T-ADD demonstration flagged as insufficient
17% buffer, no reversals, but non-permanence assessment questioned
0% deduction with contradictory justifications across documents
Project-specific measured baseline; reassessment not yet due under VCS 10-year rule
FPIC and grievance mechanism present but multiple safeguards gaps flagged
CORSIA and CCP status not stated; REDD+ double-counting risk flagged
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →