The Giving Trees
#35of 80 in ARR (afforestation)#1021of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#472of 806 in AMS-I.D
Audit Analysis
The Giving Trees is a 7.25 MW wind energy project in Tamil Nadu, India, verified by SGS under CDM AMS-I-D methodology, yet it is misclassified in the registry as a 'Nature-based Removal' credit and carries a 'Late to verify' status. The underlying avoided-emissions project is technically sound with a jurisdictional baseline and a 0% leakage deduction that is reasonable for grid-connected wind, but the fundamental credit-type misclassification, registry confusion (CDM vs. VCS), and unresolved verification status create significant integrity and claim-safety concerns.
Red Flags
- Credit is classified as 'Nature-based Removal' in the registry, but the project is a 7.25 MW wind energy avoided-emissions project — a fundamental misclassification that misrepresents the nature of the credit to buyers
- Registry status is 'Late to verify', meaning the project has not completed its verification cycle, raising questions about whether the 21,704 tCO2e credits are fully validated
- Registry field lists 'CDM' while the project header states 'VCS'; the methodology AMS-I-D is a CDM AMS, creating ambiguity about which registry and standard actually govern the credits
- Project name in the registry ('The Giving Trees') does not match the project name in the verification report ('7.25 MW Wind Energy project of Aruppukottai Sri Jayavilas Ltd.'), suggesting possible rebranding or data-entry error
- Five material findings in the verification report, including a crediting-period start-date adjustment, data mismatches in monitoring sheets, a month with zero generation, a meter-accuracy discrepancy, and a monitoring parameter not tracked before UNFCCC registration
- Buffer pool size not disclosed in available documents
Credit Vintages Exhausted
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 9,074 | 9,074 | 0 | |
| 2007 | 12,630 | 12,630 | 0 | |
| Total | 21,704 | 21,704 | 0 |
Risk Indicators
Combined test present; VVB confirmation not explicitly stated in extracted record
Avoided-emissions project (lower reversal risk), but buffer pool not stated and verification status unresolved
0% deduction with 'deemed negligible' justification — appropriate for grid-connected wind
Jurisdictional baseline (good), but last reassessment date not stated in available documents
Safeguards mentioned and benefit-sharing described, but FPIC and grievance mechanism not confirmed
CORSIA eligibility and CCP status both not stated; registry ambiguity (CDM vs VCS) adds uncertainty
Where to buy
Marketplaces
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →