Skip to main content
VCSAgriculture Forestry and Other Land UseKenya Registry: RegisteredGeneral Methodologyv2.1

TIST Program in Kenya, VCS 003

VCS-596 ↗

#143of 261 in Soil carbon#102of 157 in Kenya#970of 1339 in Verra (VCS)

4.6/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
4.0

Audit Analysis

The TIST Kenya agroforestry project has a VVB-confirmed additionality assessment and no reported reversal events, but suffers from a project-specific baseline, a thin 0% leakage justification, and significant operational attrition (239 project areas removed, 454 pending). The most recent monitoring period delivered only about 48% of the pro-rata ex-ante expectation, and multiple data-quality errors in the verification and monitoring reports undermine confidence in the reported figures.

Red Flags

  • The 2020 monitoring period verified only 33,231 tCO2e against a pro-rata expectation of roughly 69,500 tCO2e (434,464 lifetime ex-ante × 4.8/30 years), i.e. about 48% of the expected delivery for the elapsed period.
  • 239 project areas were removed from the project description and 454 remain in a 'Pending' category since the last monitoring period, indicating substantial operational attrition.
  • Buffer pool was reduced from 20% (2011 verification) to 10% (2020 verification) without a clearly documented risk re-assessment in the extracted record.
  • Leakage deduction is 0% with only a 'deemed negligible' justification, which is thin for an agroforestry project where displaced grazing or cropland is a plausible leakage pathway.
  • Multiple arithmetic and reporting errors were identified in the monitoring report (buffer calculation, incorrect net GHG value of 0 instead of 21,705, missing Non-Permanence Risk appendix).

Credit Vintages Exhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2004
18,84618,8460
2011
19,53419,5340
2015
29,90829,9080
Total68,28868,2880

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

10% buffer, no reversals, but buffer halved since 2011

Leakage

0% deduction, 'deemed negligible' justification is thin

Baseline

Project-specific, reassessment date not stated

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, and safeguards documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-10General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents