Travis County Forest Carbon Offsets
#176of 389 in United States#52of 59 in City Forest Credits (CFC)
Audit Analysis
The Travis County urban forest project has VVB-confirmed additionality and a 5% buffer pool, but is burdened by multiple material findings including acreage loss, ownership changes, cattle damage, and herbicide-related mortality. Leakage is entirely unaddressed, and four parcels overlap with a separate project (ID 014), creating a residual double-counting risk. The project over-delivered relative to its pro-rata ex-ante expectation, which is reassuring for credit validity, but the documentation gaps and baseline-method inconsistency temper confidence.
Red Flags
- Four parcels (Sites 6, 7, 13, 14) are shared with Project ID 014; 0.35 acres of overlap are flagged for removal in a later issuance, creating a residual double-counting risk until resolved.
- Leakage deduction and justification are both absent from the extracted record, leaving no documented treatment of displacement risk for an urban planting project.
- Site 10 experienced acreage reduction (4.78 → 2.59 acres), ownership transfer to PINTAIL RESOURCES LLC, cattle fence breach, and ~100% mortality on 0.21 acres from suspected herbicide runoff — multiple concurrent stressors on a single site.
- Survival rates on Site 12 fell below the 25% threshold anticipated by the methodology, indicating the planting may not achieve projected sequestration.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 871 | 0 | 871 | |
| 2024 | 3,110 | 2,599 | 511 | |
| Total | 3,981 | 2,599 | 1,382 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
Site 10 reversals absorbed
No deduction or justification found
Project-specific; method label inconsistent across docs
Safeguards and benefit-sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism unstated
CORSIA/CCP unstated; 4 parcels shared with Project 014
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →