Skip to main content
CFCUrban Forest CarbonUnited StatesGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Travis County Reforestation Program 2021

CFC-travis-county-reforestation-pr ↗

#29of 80 in ARR (afforestation)#210of 345 in United States#57of 59 in City Forest Credits (CFC)

4.8/ 10
Integrity
4.0
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

The Travis County Reforestation Program is a VVB-verified urban reforestation project with a confirmed combined additionality test and a 5% buffer pool, but it carries significant material findings including a 1.3-acre area reduction, a baseline canopy correction from 0% to 16.63%, and severe mortality at one site due to drought and fencing failure. The verified ERR of 1,169 tCO₂ for the first ~4-year monitoring period represents roughly 247% of the pro-rata expectation from the 3,076 tCO₂ lifetime ex-ante estimate, indicating the project is over-delivering relative to its revised baseline, though the original PDD claim of 3,831.6 tCO₂ was substantially higher. Leakage treatment is entirely absent from the record, and several safeguards elements (FPIC, grievance mechanism) are undocumented.

Red Flags

  • Leakage deduction and justification are entirely absent from all available documents for a reforestation project where displacement of existing vegetation or land-use change is a realistic risk
  • Baseline canopy coverage was corrected from 0% to 16.63% during verification, indicating the original PDD overestimated the carbon gain by ignoring pre-existing tree cover
  • Site 6 experienced near-100% mortality on 0.21 acres due to herbicide runoff and cattle grazing, with survival rates below the 25% protocol threshold, and extreme drought in Central Texas is expected to continue
  • The PDD originally claimed 3,831.6 tCO₂ while the current verified figure is 1,169 tCO₂ — a 69% reduction that, while partly attributable to different reporting bases, signals a materially weaker project than initially presented
  • FPIC and grievance mechanism are not documented in any available record despite the project operating on floodplain land with multiple landowner partnerships
  • Leakage not addressed in project documentation

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2022
3640364
2025
1,169217952
Total1,5332171,316

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

5% buffer, no reversals, but Site 6 mortality and drought risk

Leakage

No deduction or justification found in any document

Baseline

Project-specific; canopy corrected from 0% to 16.63%

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned but FPIC and grievance mechanism undocumented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents