Up Energy Improved Cookstoves Programme, Uganda – CPA No 027 supported by Republic of Korea
GS-3751 ↗ · current registry ID: GS11516
#187of 1329 in Industrial#19of 163 in Uganda#333of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)#40of 189 in AMS-II.G
Audit Analysis
The Up Energy Improved Cookstoves project in Uganda has a solid additionality foundation (combined test confirmed by Carbon Check India) and a quantified 5% leakage deduction, but is undermined by a striking 26-fold gap between the ex-ante lifetime estimate (~113,098 tCO₂e over 5 years) and the single-year verified figure (600,815 tCO₂e), a double-counting corrective action, and the absence of a buffer pool. Several material findings and corrective actions, including a methodology paragraph that could not be located in the cited AMS version, further erode confidence in the project's documentation and calculation chain.
Red Flags
- Verified ERR of 600,815 tCO₂e (2022 monitoring) is approximately 26.6× the pro-rata annual ex-ante expectation of ~22,620 tCO₂e (113,098 tCO₂e lifetime ÷ 5-year crediting period), raising serious questions about the ex-ante estimate or the verification calculation
- Corrective action CAR#2 explicitly requires cross-checking ICS databases to avoid double counting with an existing project, indicating a potential double-claiming risk was identified by the VVB
- Compliance-level finding CL 01: a methodology paragraph quoted in the PoA-DD was not found in AMS-II.G. v12, suggesting a possible mis-citation of the underlying methodology
Credit Vintages Exhausted
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 29,165 | 29,165 | 0 | |
| Total | 29,165 | 29,165 | 0 |
Risk Indicators
Combined test, VVB-confirmed
no reversal events but no explicit safeguard
5% quantified deduction
Project-specific baseline, reassessed 2024
FPIC, grievance mechanism, and safeguards documented
CORSIA/CCP not stated; CAR#2 flags ICS overlap risk
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →