Up Energy Improved Cookstoves Programme, Uganda – CPA No 033 supported by Republic of Korea
GS-3757 ↗ · current registry ID: GS11522
#807of 1329 in Industrial#101of 163 in Uganda#1203of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)#129of 189 in AMS-II.G
Audit Analysis
The Up Energy Improved Cookstoves project in Uganda has a solid additionality assessment (combined test, VVB-verified) and a quantified 5% leakage deduction, but suffers from a critical data reliability issue: the verified ERR of 600,815 tCO₂e for the 2022 monitoring period is roughly 27 times the annualised lifetime ex-ante estimate of ~22,620 tCO₂e/year. No buffer pool is stated for a cookstove project with inherent reversal risk, and several material findings (methodology paragraph error, missing SDG assessment, double-counting cross-check) indicate documentation weaknesses that were only partially resolved.
Red Flags
- Verified ERR of 600,815 tCO₂e (2022 monitoring period) is approximately 26.6× the annualised lifetime ex-ante estimate (~22,620 tCO₂e/year over 5 years), raising serious over-crediting or scope-mismatch concerns
- CAR#2 in the verification report explicitly requires cross-checking ICS databases to avoid double counting with an existing project, indicating a potential double-claiming risk that was not fully resolved
- The 2022 monitoring period predates the current crediting period (Dec 2024 – Dec 2029), meaning the only available verification does not cover the active crediting window
Credit Vintages Exhausted
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 27,825 | 27,825 | 0 | |
| Total | 27,825 | 27,825 | 0 |
Risk Indicators
Combined test, VVB-verified
cookstove reversal risk unaddressed
5% quantified deduction with justification
Project-specific baseline, reassessed 2024
FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing documented
CORSIA and CCP status not stated; CAR flags ICS cross-check
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →